If you already have an account, we'll log you in
๐ถ 37-year old
โ ๏ธ Non-progressive
๐ซ Not religious
๐ Single
โ๐ป White
๐ Heterosexual
๐จ โ Man
๐
with a
Bachelor's
๐ป
works as a
Software Dev
๐ก
from
a Home office
๐ฐ
makes
$85,000 / y
โ๏ธ
loves
Coffee
๐ฅฉ eats meat
๐ฅพ
works out by
Hiking
๐ฏ๐ต
loves
Tokyo most
๐
is vaccinated
๐
produces 72% less COโ
5๏ธโฃ
and stays for
5 months
๐ถ Nomads by age |
||||
| Age | % | |||
| 18 |
0.1%
|
|||
| 21 |
0.1%
|
|||
| 22 |
0.3%
|
|||
| 23 |
0.3%
|
|||
| 24 |
0.5%
|
|||
| 25 |
1%
|
|||
| 26 |
1%
|
|||
| 27 |
2%
|
|||
| 28 |
2%
|
|||
| 29 |
2%
|
|||
| 30 |
2%
|
|||
| 31 |
3%
|
|||
| 32 |
5%
|
|||
| 33 |
7%
|
|||
| 34 |
7%
|
|||
| 35 |
5%
|
|||
| 36 |
6%
|
|||
| 37 |
9%
|
|||
| 38 |
6%
|
|||
| 39 |
5%
|
|||
| 40 |
5%
|
|||
| 41 |
4%
|
|||
| 42 |
4%
|
|||
| 43 |
3%
|
|||
| 44 |
2%
|
active last 365d, n=1,010 | ||
โณ๏ธ Nomads by nationality |
||||
| # | Country | People | % | |
| 1 | ๐บ๐ธ United States | 55,878,138 | 42% | |
| 2 | ๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom | 9,108,647 | 7% | |
| 3 | ๐จ๐ฆ Canada | 6,107,422 | 5% | |
| 4 | ๐ท๐บ Russia | 5,868,851 | 4% | |
| 5 | ๐ฉ๐ช Germany | 5,625,508 | 4% | |
| 6 | ๐ซ๐ท France | 4,704,623 | 4% | |
| 7 | ๐ง๐ท Brazil | 3,611,967 | 3% | |
| 8 | ๐ฆ๐บ Australia | 3,134,825 | 2% | |
| 9 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands | 2,500,226 | 2% | |
| 10 | ๐ช๐ธ Spain | 2,476,369 | 2% | |
| 11 | ๐ฎ๐ณ India | 2,466,826 | 2% | |
| 12 | ๐ฎ๐น Italy | 1,994,455 | 1% | |
| 13 | ๐บ๐ฆ Ukraine | 1,937,198 | 1% | |
| 14 | ๐ต๐ฑ Poland | 1,641,370 | 1% | |
| 15 | ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland | 1,355,084 | 1% | |
| 16 | ๐น๐ท Turkey | 1,035,399 | 1% | |
| 17 | ๐ฆ๐น Austria | 1,011,542 | 1% | |
| 18 | ๐ฏ๐ต Japan | 954,285 | 1% | |
| 19 | ๐ธ๐ช Sweden | 935,199 | 1% | |
| 20 | ๐ฎ๐ช Ireland | 916,113 | 1% | |
| 21 | ๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel | 834,999 | 1% | |
| 22 | ๐ง๐ช Belgium | 820,685 | 1% | |
| 23 | ๐จ๐ฟ Czechia | 782,513 | 1% | |
| 24 | ๐ฐ๐ท South Korea | 772,971 | 1% | |
| 25 | ๐ฆ๐ท Argentina | 734,799 | 1% | |
| 26 | ๐ต๐น Portugal | 730,028 | 1% | |
| 27 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa | 715,713 | 1% | |
| 28 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico | 715,713 | 1% | |
| 29 | ๐ท๐ด Romania | 696,628 | 1% | |
| 30 | ๐จ๐ณ China | 667,999 | 1% | n=27,966 |
๐ถ Nomads by gender |
||||
| Gender | % | |||
| ๐จโ Men |
82%
|
|||
| ๐ฑโโ๏ธ Women |
18%
|
|||
| ๐ง Other |
0%
|
active last 365d, n=14,164 | ||
๐ Nomads by sexuality |
||||
| Sexuality | % | |||
| ๐ Heterosexual |
88%
|
|||
| ๐ฆ Bisexual |
7%
|
|||
| ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ Gay or lesbian |
5%
|
n=17,805 | ||
๐ Nomads by beliefs |
||||
| Religion | % | |||
| ๐ซ Not religious |
51%
|
|||
| ๐ Spirituality |
28%
|
|||
| โช๏ธ Christianity |
10%
|
|||
| ๐ Buddhism |
3%
|
|||
| ๐ Islam |
3%
|
|||
| โจ Astrology |
2%
|
|||
| ๐ Judaism |
2%
|
|||
| ๐ Hinduism |
1%
|
|||
| ๐ณ Sikhism |
0%
|
n=9,296 | ||
โ Nomads by ethnicity |
||||
| Ethnicity | % | |||
| โ๐ป White |
59%
|
|||
| โ๐พ Non-white |
41%
|
|||
| ↱โ๐ผ Asian |
14%
|
|||
| ↱โ๐ฝ Latin |
12%
|
|||
| ↱โ๐ฟ Black |
7%
|
|||
| ↱โ๐ฝ Indian |
5%
|
|||
| ↱โ๐พ Middle Eastern |
3%
|
|||
| ↱โ๐ฝ Pacific |
1%
|
n=8,452 | ||
๐ Education |
||||
| Education | % | |||
| ๐ High School |
9%
|
|||
| ๐ Higher education |
91%
|
|||
| ↱๐ Bachelor's |
53%
|
|||
| ↱๐ Master's |
34%
|
|||
| ↱๐ฉโ๐ซ PhD |
3%
|
n=19,602 | ||
โค๏ธ Nomads by relationship |
||||
| Relationship | % | |||
| ๐ Single |
67%
|
|||
| ๐ In a relationship |
33%
|
n=11,275 | ||
๐ Nomads looking for |
||||
| Looking for | % | |||
| ๐ค Friends |
36%
|
|||
| ๐ Travel buddies |
32%
|
|||
| ๐น Casual dating |
15%
|
|||
| โค๏ธ Relationship |
13%
|
|||
| ๐ Poly dating |
4%
|
n=66,004 | ||
๐ฐ Nomads by income |
||||
| Income | % | |||
| < $25k / y |
7%
|
|||
| $25k - $50k / y |
15%
|
|||
| $50k - $100k / y |
33%
|
|||
| $100k - $250k / y |
35%
|
|||
| > $250k - $1M / y |
9%
|
|||
| > $1M / y |
2%
|
|||
| Average | $125,202 / y | |||
| Median | $85,000 / y | n=5,817 | ||
๐ฐ Nomads by employment |
||||
| Employment type | % | |||
| Full time |
37%
|
|||
| Freelance |
19%
|
|||
| Startup founder |
19%
|
|||
| Full time contractor |
9%
|
|||
| Agency |
8%
|
|||
| Other |
6%
|
|||
| Part time |
2%
|
|||
| Part time contractor |
1%
|
n=7,505 | ||
๐ก Where do nomads work from |
||||
| Place | % | |||
| ๐ก Home office |
58%
|
|||
| ๐ฌ Coworking |
15%
|
|||
| โ๏ธ Cafe |
8%
|
|||
| ๐ข Office |
8%
|
|||
| ๐ Couch |
3%
|
|||
| ๐ฝ Dining table |
3%
|
|||
| ๐ Bed |
2%
|
|||
| ๐ช Balcony |
1%
|
|||
| ๐ Van |
1%
|
|||
| ๐ช Kitchen |
0%
|
|||
| ๐ชด Garden |
0%
|
|||
| ๐ฅ Boat |
0%
|
|||
| ๐ฆ Pool |
0%
|
|||
| ๐ Library |
0%
|
n=6,291 | ||
๐ฌ What messaging apps nomads use? |
||||
| Messaging app | % | |||
| Telegram |
50%
|
|||
|
43%
|
||||
| Snapchat |
3%
|
|||
|
2%
|
||||
|
0%
|
||||
| LINE |
0%
|
|||
| Slack |
0%
|
n=6,185 | ||
โ๏ธ Nomad men by politics |
||||
| Politics | % | |||
| ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ Progressive |
44%
|
|||
| โ๏ธ Non-progressive |
56%
|
|||
| ↱๐ฝ Libertarian |
27%
|
|||
| ↱โ๏ธ Centrist |
21%
|
|||
| ↱๐ด Conservative |
8%
|
n=3,862 | ||
โ๏ธ Nomad women by politics |
||||
| Politics | % | |||
| ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ Progressive |
72%
|
|||
| โ๏ธ Non-progressive |
28%
|
|||
| ↱๐ฝ Libertarian |
13%
|
|||
| ↱โ๏ธ Centrist |
12%
|
|||
| ↱๐ด Conservative |
3%
|
n=888 | ||
๐ฅฉ 77% of ๐จโ men eat meat
๐ฅฉ 57% of ๐ฑโโ๏ธwomen eat meat
๐ซ 37% of nomads don't eat meat
๐ฅ 11% are vegetarian
๐ฅ 11% are vegan
๐ 5% are pescetarian
๐ Nomad men by diet |
||||
| Diet | % | |||
| ๐ฅฉ Eats meat |
77%
|
|||
| ๐ซ Does not eat meat |
23%
|
|||
| ↱๐ฅ Vegetarian |
10%
|
|||
| ↱๐ฅ Vegan |
10%
|
|||
| ↱๐ Pescetarian |
4%
|
n=6,004 | ||
๐ Nomad women by diet |
||||
| Diet | % | |||
| ๐ฅฉ Eats meat |
57%
|
|||
| ๐ซ Does not eat meat |
43%
|
|||
| ↱๐ฅ Vegetarian |
19%
|
|||
| ↱๐ฅ Vegan |
15%
|
|||
| ↱๐ Pescetarian |
10%
|
n=1,274 | ||
๐ฅพ Hiking
๐ช Fitness
๐ Running
๐คธโโ๏ธ Yoga
๐ Swimming
๐ด Cycling
๐ Nomad men by sports |
||||
| Sport | % | |||
| ๐ช Fitness |
49%
|
|||
| ๐ฅพ Hiking |
47%
|
|||
| ๐ Running |
28%
|
|||
| ๐ด Cycling |
24%
|
|||
| ๐ Swimming |
23%
|
|||
| ๐คธโโ๏ธ Yoga |
20%
|
|||
| ๐ Surfing |
18%
|
|||
| ๐ Diving |
15%
|
|||
| โท Skiing |
15%
|
|||
| ๐ Snowboarding |
15%
|
|||
| โฐ Climbing |
15%
|
|||
| ๐พ Tennis |
14%
|
|||
| ๐ Motorcycling |
13%
|
|||
| ๐ช Fight sports |
10%
|
|||
| ๐ Table tennis |
9%
|
n=11,652 | ||
๐ Nomad women by sports |
||||
| Sport | % | |||
| ๐ฅพ Hiking |
51%
|
|||
| ๐คธโโ๏ธ Yoga |
45%
|
|||
| ๐ช Fitness |
40%
|
|||
| ๐ Swimming |
25%
|
|||
| ๐ Running |
21%
|
|||
| ๐ด Cycling |
17%
|
|||
| ๐ Diving |
15%
|
|||
| ๐ Surfing |
14%
|
|||
| โฐ Climbing |
13%
|
|||
| โท Skiing |
12%
|
|||
| ๐พ Tennis |
11%
|
|||
| ๐ Snowboarding |
9%
|
|||
| ๐ช Crossfit |
5%
|
|||
| ๐ Motorcycling |
5%
|
|||
| ๐ Volleyball |
5%
|
n=2,677 | ||
๐ฏ๐ต Tokyo
๐ต๐น Ericeira
๐บ๐ธ Chicago
๐ต๐น Portimรฃo
๐ง๐ฌ Varna
๐ฎ๐ธ Reykjavik
๐ Most liked cities by men |
||||
| # | City | Rating | ||
| 1 | ๐ฒ๐พ Kuala Lumpur | 4.55 | ||
| 2 | ๐ฏ๐ต Tokyo | 4.38 | ||
| 3 | ๐น๐ญ Chiang Mai | 4.29 | ||
| 4 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | 4.17 | ||
| 5 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | 4.17 | ||
| 6 | ๐ฏ๐ต Osaka | 4.17 | ||
| 7 | ๐จ๐ฟ Prague | 4.17 | ||
| 8 | ๐ช๐ธ Madrid | 4.17 | ||
| 9 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Amsterdam | 4.17 | ||
| 10 | ๐น๐ญ Bangkok | 4.12 | ||
| 11 | ๐ต๐ฑ Krakรณw | 4.00 | ||
| 12 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Ubud | 4.00 | ||
| 13 | ๐บ๐ธ New York City | 4.00 | ||
| 14 | ๐ฌ๐น Antigua | 4.00 | ||
| 15 | ๐ฏ๐ต Fukuoka | 4.00 | n=6,788 | |
๐ Most liked cities by women |
||||
| # | City | Rating | ||
| 1 | ๐จ๐ด Medellรญn | 3.75 | ||
| 2 | ๐น๐ญ Bangkok | 3.33 | ||
| 3 | ๐น๐ญ Chiang Mai | 3.33 | ||
| 4 | ๐ป๐ณ Da Nang | 3.33 | ||
| 5 | ๐ฌ๐ช Tbilisi | 3.33 | ||
| 6 | ๐ต๐น Azores | 3.33 | ||
| 7 | ๐ช๐ธ Valencia | 3.33 | ||
| 8 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | 3.33 | ||
| 9 | ๐ฌ๐น Antigua | 3.33 | ||
| 10 | ๐ฆ๐บ Sydney | 3.33 | ||
| 11 | ๐ฆ๐ท Buenos Aires | 3.33 | ||
| 12 | ๐ณ๐ฑ The Hague | 3.33 | ||
| 13 | ๐ธ๐ช Stockholm | 3.33 | ||
| 14 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bansko | 3.33 | ||
| 15 | ๐ฒ๐พ Johor Bahru | 3.33 | n=6,788 | |
๐ Most visited cities |
||||
| # | City | % visited | ||
| 1 | ๐น๐ญ Bangkok | 2.22% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฌ๐ง London | 2.19% | ||
| 3 | ๐ช๐ธ Barcelona | 1.48% | ||
| 4 | ๐ซ๐ท Paris | 1.46% | ||
| 5 | ๐บ๐ธ New York City | 1.46% | ||
| 6 | ๐ต๐น Lisbon | 1.43% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฉ๐ช Berlin | 1.43% | ||
| 8 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Amsterdam | 1.18% | ||
| 9 | ๐บ๐ธ San Francisco | 1.13% | ||
| 10 | ๐น๐ญ Chiang Mai | 1.07% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | 0.98% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฏ๐ต Tokyo | 0.93% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Canggu | 0.91% | ||
| 14 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | 0.89% | ||
| 15 | ๐น๐ท Istanbul | 0.86% | ||
| 16 | ๐ช๐ธ Madrid | 0.83% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฒ๐พ Kuala Lumpur | 0.81% | ||
| 18 | ๐บ๐ธ Los Angeles | 0.8% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฆ๐ช Dubai | 0.79% | ||
| 20 | ๐ญ๐บ Budapest | 0.77% | ||
| 21 | ๐จ๐ฟ Prague | 0.71% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฆ๐ท Buenos Aires | 0.69% | ||
| 23 | ๐จ๐ด Medellรญn | 0.62% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฎ๐น Rome | 0.6% | ||
| 25 | ๐ท๐บ Moscow | 0.59% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฆ๐น Vienna | 0.57% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฐ๐ท Seoul | 0.56% | ||
| 28 | ๐ป๐ณ Ho Chi Minh City | 0.55% | ||
| 29 | ๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong | 0.54% | ||
| 30 | ๐น๐ญ Phuket | 0.53% | n=428,982 | |
๐ Most visited countries |
||||
| # | Country | % visited | ||
| 1 | ๐บ๐ธ United States | 13% | ||
| 2 | ๐ช๐ธ Spain | 5% | ||
| 3 | ๐น๐ญ Thailand | 5% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฉ๐ช Germany | 4% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom | 4% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico | 3% | ||
| 7 | ๐ซ๐ท France | 3% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฎ๐น Italy | 3% | ||
| 9 | ๐ต๐น Portugal | 3% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia | 2% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฏ๐ต Japan | 2% | ||
| 12 | ๐ง๐ท Brazil | 2% | ||
| 13 | ๐จ๐ฆ Canada | 2% | ||
| 14 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands | 2% | ||
| 15 | ๐ป๐ณ Vietnam | 2% | ||
| 16 | ๐น๐ท Turkey | 2% | ||
| 17 | ๐ท๐บ Russia | 1% | ||
| 18 | ๐ต๐ฑ Poland | 1% | ||
| 19 | ๐จ๐ด Colombia | 1% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฎ๐ณ India | 1% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia | 1% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฆ๐บ Australia | 1% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฌ๐ท Greece | 1% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฆ๐ท Argentina | 1% | ||
| 25 | ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland | 1% | ||
| 26 | ๐จ๐ณ China | 1% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฆ๐น Austria | 1% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฆ๐ช United Arab Emirates | 1% | ||
| 29 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | 1% | ||
| 30 | ๐ญ๐ท Croatia | 1% | n=428,982 | |
๐ Avg. COโ by member traveling |
||||
| Year | COโ | |||
| 2013 |
674 kg/y
|
|||
| 2014 |
985 kg/y
|
|||
| 2015 |
1,075 kg/y
|
|||
| 2016 |
1,286 kg/y
|
|||
| 2017 |
1,464 kg/y
|
|||
| 2018 |
1,540 kg/y
|
|||
| 2019 |
1,570 kg/y
|
|||
| 2020 |
990 kg/y
|
|||
| 2021 |
1,002 kg/y
|
|||
| 2022 |
1,571 kg/y
|
|||
| 2023 |
1,722 kg/y
|
|||
| 2024 |
1,696 kg/y
|
|||
| 2025 |
1,600 kg/y
|
|||
| 2026 |
1,662 kg/y
|
|||
| Average | 1,308 kg/y | |||
| Median | 1,375 kg/y |
Based on 428,982 trips by 16,290 members @ 115g/km COโ emitted. An average American spends ~5,000kg/y on commuting by car and flying. We'd assume nomads travel more internationally but on the other hand they don't commute to work since they work 100% remotely. Many walk to work or work from their home, hotel or Airbnb. That means on average nomads generate 1,375 kg/y, or 72% less COโ than the average American on travel and commuting. |
||
๐จ Where men go most |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. ๐ฑโโ๏ธ | ||
| 1 | ๐น๐ญ Bangkok | +25% | ||
| 2 | ๐ต๐น Lisbon | -16% | ||
| 3 | ๐ช๐ธ Barcelona | -10% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฌ๐ง London | -22% | ||
| 5 | ๐น๐ญ Chiang Mai | -2% | ||
| 6 | ๐ซ๐ท Paris | -23% | ||
| 7 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Amsterdam | +2% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฉ๐ช Berlin | -3% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Canggu | +4% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฏ๐ต Tokyo | +14% | ||
| 11 | ๐น๐ท Istanbul | +7% | ||
| 12 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | +12% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐พ Kuala Lumpur | +27% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | -20% | ||
| 15 | ๐ญ๐บ Budapest | +16% | median temp=18°C; n=428,982 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Where women go most |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. ๐จ | ||
| 1 | ๐ต๐น Lisbon | +19% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฌ๐ง London | +28% | ||
| 3 | ๐น๐ญ Bangkok | -20% | ||
| 4 | ๐ซ๐ท Paris | +30% | ||
| 5 | ๐ช๐ธ Barcelona | +11% | ||
| 6 | ๐น๐ญ Chiang Mai | +2% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | +25% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฉ๐ช Berlin | +3% | ||
| 9 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Amsterdam | -2% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Canggu | -4% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฎ๐น Rome | +26% | ||
| 12 | ๐น๐ท Istanbul | -6% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Ubud | +31% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฏ๐ต Tokyo | -13% | ||
| 15 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | -11% | median temp=18°C; n=428,982 | |
๐จ Where men go more |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. women | ||
| 1 | ๐ท๐บ Russia | +78% | ||
| 2 | ๐ต๐ฑ Poland | +63% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฌ๐ช Georgia | +49% | ||
| 4 | ๐ท๐ด Romania | +48% | ||
| 5 | ๐ต๐ญ Philippines | +36% | ||
| 6 | ๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong | +32% | ||
| 7 | ๐ท๐ธ Serbia | +28% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฆ๐ช United Arab Emirates | +28% | ||
| 9 | ๐จ๐ณ China | +25% | ||
| 10 | ๐จ๐ฟ Czechia | +21% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฏ๐ต Japan | +20% | ||
| 12 | ๐ป๐ณ Vietnam | +19% | ||
| 13 | ๐ณ๐ด Norway | +19% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia | +17% | ||
| 15 | ๐ญ๐บ Hungary | +16% | median temp=13°C; n=428,982 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Where women go more |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. men | ||
| 1 | ๐จ๐ท Costa Rica | +52% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa | +49% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico | +38% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom | +31% | ||
| 5 | ๐ญ๐ท Croatia | +29% | ||
| 6 | ๐ซ๐ท France | +23% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฎ๐น Italy | +21% | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐ฑ Chile | +19% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฌ๐ท Greece | +14% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฆ๐บ Australia | +13% | ||
| 11 | ๐ต๐น Portugal | +12% | ||
| 12 | ๐ต๐ช Peru | +10% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฎ๐ช Ireland | +9% | ||
| 14 | ๐ช๐ธ Spain | +7% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฆ๐ท Argentina | +6% | median temp=18°C; n=428,982 | |
๐ Most liked countries |
||||
| # | Country | Rating | ||
| 1 | ๐ฏ๐ต Japan | 4.85 | ||
| 2 | ๐ญ๐บ Hungary | 4.65 | ||
| 3 | ๐จ๐ฟ Czechia | 4.55 | ||
| 4 | ๐ญ๐ท Croatia | 4.55 | ||
| 5 | ๐ฑ๐ป Latvia | 4.5 | ||
| 6 | ๐ต๐ฑ Poland | 4.45 | ||
| 7 | ๐ฐ๐ท South Korea | 4.4 | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland | 4.4 | ||
| 9 | ๐ฌ๐น Guatemala | 4.3 | ||
| 10 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Kazakhstan | 4.3 | ||
| 11 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa | 4.25 | ||
| 12 | ๐ช๐ช Estonia | 4.25 | ||
| 13 | ๐ฑ๐น Lithuania | 4.25 | ||
| 14 | ๐ท๐บ Russia | 4.25 | ||
| 15 | ๐ฌ๐ท Greece | 4.2 | n=4,022 | |
๐คฎ Least liked countries |
||||
| # | Country | Rating | ||
| 1 | ๐จ๐บ Cuba | 1 | ||
| 2 | ๐ฎ๐ท Iran | 1.65 | ||
| 3 | ๐ฌ๐ฎ Gibraltar | 1.65 | ||
| 4 | ๐ญ๐ณ Honduras | 1.65 | ||
| 5 | ๐จ๐พ Cyprus | 1.65 | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐ฉ Moldova | 2 | ||
| 7 | ๐ฒ๐น Malta | 2.15 | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐ฑ Chile | 2.25 | ||
| 9 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Sri Lanka | 2.35 | ||
| 10 | ๐ธ๐ด Somalia | 2.5 | ||
| 11 | ๐ช๐น Ethiopia | 2.5 | ||
| 12 | ๐น๐ฟ Tanzania | 2.5 | ||
| 13 | ๐ธ๐ณ Senegal | 2.5 | ||
| 14 | ๐จ๐ฒ Cameroon | 2.5 | ||
| 15 | ๐ด Kurdistan | 2.5 | n=4,022 | |
โฐ How long do nomads stay in one city? |
||||
| Duration | % | |||
| < 7 days |
47%
|
|||
| 7 - 30 days |
33%
|
|||
| 30 - 90 days |
14%
|
|||
| 90+ days |
6%
|
|||
| Average | 63 days (2 months) | |||
| Median | 7 days | n=418,046 | ||
๐ก How long do nomads stay in one country? |
||||
| Duration | % | |||
| < 7 days |
0%
|
|||
| 7 - 30 days |
59%
|
|||
| 30 - 90 days |
28%
|
|||
| 90+ days |
14%
|
|||
| Average | 154 days (5 months) | n=418,046 | ||
๐ป Software Dev
๐ Startup Founder
๐ธ Web Dev
๐ Marketing
๐ฉโ๐จ Creative
๐ SaaS
๐จ Nomad men work as |
||||
| # | Work | % | vs. women | |
| 1 | ๐ป Software Dev | 32% | +284% | |
| 2 | ๐ Startup Founder | 25% | +132% | |
| 3 | ๐ธ Web Dev | 25% | +280% | |
| 4 | ๐ Marketing | 14% | -10% | |
| 5 | ๐ SaaS | 12% | +183% | |
| 6 | ๐ฉโ๐จ Creative | 11% | -28% | |
| 7 | ๐ฑ Mobile Dev | 10% | +347% | |
| 8 | ๐จ UI/UX Design | 10% | +24% | |
| 9 | ๐ค Product Manager | 10% | +57% | |
| 10 | ๐ Data | 9% | +80% | |
| 11 | ๐ฐ Crypto | 9% | +268% | |
| 12 | ๐ฐ Finance | 9% | +110% | |
| 13 | ๐ Ecommerce | 8% | +87% | |
| 14 | ๐ค Sales | 7% | +68% | |
| 15 | ๐ Dev Ops | 6% | +436% | n=25,747 |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Nomad women work as |
||||
| # | Work | % | vs. men | |
| 1 | ๐ Marketing | 15% | +11% | |
| 2 | ๐ฉโ๐จ Creative | 15% | +38% | |
| 3 | ๐ Startup Founder | 11% | -57% | |
| 4 | ๐ป Software Dev | 8% | -74% | |
| 5 | ๐จ UI/UX Design | 8% | -19% | |
| 6 | ๐ค Community | 8% | +48% | |
| 7 | ๐ Blogging | 7% | +40% | |
| 8 | ๐จโ๐ซ Education | 7% | +34% | |
| 9 | ๐ Coach | 7% | +44% | |
| 10 | ๐ธ Web Dev | 7% | -74% | |
| 11 | ๐ค Product Manager | 6% | -36% | |
| 12 | ๐ Data | 5% | -44% | |
| 13 | ๐ SaaS | 4% | -65% | |
| 14 | ๐ฐ Finance | 4% | -52% | |
| 15 | ๐ Ecommerce | 4% | -47% | n=6,709 |
๐จ Nomad men vs. women |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. women | ||
| 1 | ๐ Dev Ops | +436% | ||
| 2 | ๐ Engineering | +424% | ||
| 3 | ๐ก Sysadmin | +406% | ||
| 4 | ๐ Investor | +356% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฑ Mobile Dev | +347% | ||
| 6 | ๐พ Game Dev | +324% | ||
| 7 | ๐ช Military | +317% | ||
| 8 | ๐ค AI | +292% | ||
| 9 | ๐ป Software Dev | +284% | ||
| 10 | ๐ธ Web Dev | +280% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฐ Crypto | +268% | ||
| 12 | ๐ก๏ธ InfoSec | +252% | ||
| 13 | ๐ค AI model | +223% | ||
| 14 | ๐ SaaS | +183% | ||
| 15 | ๐ VR Dev | +153% | n=32,353 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Nomad women vs. men |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. men | ||
| 1 | ๐ธ House wife | +130% | ||
| 2 | ๐งโ๐ผ Human resources | +101% | ||
| 3 | ๐ Tradwife | +92% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฐ Journalism | +78% | ||
| 5 | ๐ง Psychologist | +78% | ||
| 6 | ๐ Support | +61% | ||
| 7 | ๐ Hospitality | +56% | ||
| 8 | ๐ค Community | +48% | ||
| 9 | ๐จโโ๏ธ Medical | +48% | ||
| 10 | ๐ Coach | +44% | ||
| 11 | ๐ Blogging | +40% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฉโ๐จ Creative | +38% | ||
| 13 | ๐ณ Chef | +37% | ||
| 14 | ๐จโ๐ซ Education | +34% | ||
| 15 | ๐ Recruitment | +33% | n=32,353 | |
โ๏ธ Coffee
๐ฌ๐ง Speaks English
๐ Optimist
โฐ Outdoors
๐ฅพ Hiking
๐ช Fitness
๐จโ Nomad men |
||||
| # | Tag | % | vs. ๐ฑโโ๏ธ | |
| 1 | โ๏ธ Coffee | 34% | +16% | |
| 2 | ๐ฌ๐ง Speaks English | 29% | +11% | |
| 3 | ๐ Optimist | 28% | +18% | |
| 4 | ๐ช Fitness | 23% | +38% | |
| 5 | ๐ Single | 23% | +22% | |
| 6 | โฐ Outdoors | 22% | -5% | |
| 7 | ๐ COVID vaccinated | 22% | +11% | |
| 8 | ๐ฅพ Hiking | 22% | +4% | |
| 9 | ๐ง Open-minded | 22% | +13% | |
| 10 | ๐ถ Dogs | 22% | -4% | |
| 11 | โ๏ธ Waking up early | 21% | +15% | |
| 12 | ๐บ Beer | 21% | +111% | |
| 13 | ๐ Staying up late | 20% | +42% | |
| 14 | ๐ Reading | 20% | -4% | |
| 15 | ๐ท Wine | 19% | -10% | n=25,747 |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Nomad women |
||||
| # | Tag | % | vs. ๐จโ | |
| 1 | โ๏ธ Coffee | 29% | -14% | |
| 2 | ๐ฌ๐ง Speaks English | 26% | -10% | |
| 3 | ๐ Optimist | 24% | -15% | |
| 4 | โฐ Outdoors | 23% | +5% | |
| 5 | ๐ถ Dogs | 23% | +4% | |
| 6 | ๐ฅพ Hiking | 21% | -4% | |
| 7 | ๐ท Wine | 21% | +11% | |
| 8 | ๐ Reading | 21% | +4% | |
| 9 | ๐ COVID vaccinated | 20% | -10% | |
| 10 | ๐ต Tea | 20% | +12% | |
| 11 | ๐ง Open-minded | 19% | -11% | |
| 12 | ๐คธโโ๏ธ Yoga | 19% | +101% | |
| 13 | ๐ Single | 19% | -18% | |
| 14 | โ๏ธ Waking up early | 18% | -13% | |
| 15 | โฑ Beach | 17% | +24% | n=6,709 |
๐จ Nomad men vs. women |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. ๐ฑโโ๏ธ | ||
| 1 | ๐จ No beard | +546% | ||
| 2 | โฝ๏ธ Football | +372% | ||
| 3 | ๐งโ Short hair | +337% | ||
| 4 | ๐ช Dropout | +256% | ||
| 5 | โ๏ธ Private pilot | +242% | ||
| 6 | ๐ Basketball | +233% | ||
| 7 | ๐ Ice hockey | +231% | ||
| 8 | ๐ Race sports | +201% | ||
| 9 | ๐ Table tennis | +195% | ||
| 10 | ๐ Motorcycling | +190% | ||
| 11 | โ๏ธ Chess | +187% | ||
| 12 | ๐ Hindu | +185% | ||
| 13 | ๐ด Conservative politics | +184% | ||
| 14 | ๐ช Fight sports | +178% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฌ ๐ | +152% | n=32,353 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Nomad women vs. men |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. ๐จ | ||
| 1 | ๐ Makeup | +3,951% | ||
| 2 | ๐คธโโ๏ธ Pilates | +1,006% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฑโโ๏ธ Long hair | +386% | ||
| 4 | ๐ถ Ceramics | +380% | ||
| 5 | ๐ Dress up | +274% | ||
| 6 | โจ Astrology | +268% | ||
| 7 | ๐ช Feminism | +247% | ||
| 8 | ๐ถ Pottery | +207% | ||
| 9 | โจ Believe in astrology | +180% | ||
| 10 | ๐ Jewelry | +179% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฅ Red hair | +160% | ||
| 12 | ๐ Fashion | +151% | ||
| 13 | ๐จ Drawing | +138% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฆพ Disabled | +134% | ||
| 15 | ๐ Dancing | +120% | n=32,353 | |
๐ Nomads by vaccination |
||||
| Vaccinated | % | |||
| ๐ COVID vaccinated |
92%
|
|||
| ๐ Not COVID vaccinated |
8%
|
n=8,476 | ||
๐ Vaccination (men) | ||||
| Vaccinated | % | |||
| ๐ Vaccinated | 92% | |||
| ๐ Not vaccinated | 8% | n=6,218 | ||
๐ Vaccination (women) | ||||
| Vaccinated | % | |||
| ๐ Vaccinated | 93% | |||
| ๐ Not vaccinated | 7% | n=1,445 | ||
โค๏ธ Nomads by family |
||||
| Relationship | % | |||
| โค๏ธ Close to parents |
82%
|
|||
| ๐ Not close to parents |
18%
|
n=2,627 | ||
๐ถ Nomads by childhood |
||||
| Childhood | % | |||
| ๐ Happy childhood |
89%
|
|||
| ๐ Unhappy childhood |
11%
|
n=2,831 | ||
๐จ Childhood (men) | ||||
| Childhood | % | |||
| ๐ Happy childhood | 90% | |||
| ๐ Unhappy childhood | 10% | n=2,153 | ||
๐ฉ Childhood (women) | ||||
| Childhood | % | |||
| ๐ Happy childhood | 87% | |||
| ๐ Unhappy childhood | 13% | n=414 | ||
๐ก Homeownership amongst nomads |
||||
| Homeownership | % | |||
| ๐ก Homeowner |
55%
|
|||
| ๐ก Not a homeowner |
45%
|
n=3,054 | ||
Attractiveness is based on the proportion of people liking or disliking a person based on their photo on Nomads.com's dating app. It does not show any of these traits in their profile when they rate them. People who are rated as attractive based on their photo are more likely to have these traits. TL;DR hot people have specific traits, but those specific traits don't necessarily make you hot (you could always try though).
๐ In a relationship
๐ My parents separated
๐ง Only child
๐ Volleyball
๐งฌ Longevity
๐จโ Most attractive men's traits |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | ๐งฌ Longevity | +227% | ||
| 2 | ๐ข Slowmad | +222% | ||
| 3 | ๐ Creatine | +192% | ||
| 4 | ๐ In a relationship | +135% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฒ Board games | +129% | ||
| 6 | ๐ธ Padel | +126% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฆ Sparkling water | +115% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฆ Still water | +89% | ||
| 9 | ๐ Basketball | +79% | ||
| 10 | ๐๏ธ Live near the beach | +78% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฅ Soft boiled eggs | +71% | ||
| 12 | ๐ก Homeowner | +70% | ||
| 13 | โจ Believe in astrology | +66% | ||
| 14 | ๐ง Dubstep music | +64% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฌ LINE | +64% | ||
| 16 | ๐ง Hiphop music | +63% | ||
| 17 | ๐ Not COVID vaccinated | +63% | ||
| 18 | ๐ก Not a homeowner | +61% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฌ ๐ | +61% | ||
| 20 | โณ๏ธ Golf | +61% | ||
| 21 | ๐ Skateboarding | +57% | ||
| 22 | โค๏ธ Happy childhood | +56% | ||
| 23 | ๐๏ธโ Weightlifting | +56% | ||
| 24 | ๐งโ Short hair | +56% | ||
| 25 | ๐ถ Middle child | +55% | ||
| 26 | ๐ Kitesurfing | +53% | ||
| 27 | ๐ Rugby | +53% | ||
| 28 | ๐ Surfing | +53% | ||
| 29 | ๐ง House music | +52% | ||
| 30 | ๐ฏ๐ฒ Reggae music | +52% | n=32,353 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Most attractive women's traits |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | ๐ฉ Samoyeds | +226% | ||
| 2 | ๐ง Only child | +223% | ||
| 3 | ๐ My parents separated | +222% | ||
| 4 | ๐ Volleyball | +205% | ||
| 5 | ๐พ Tennis | +199% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฌ Social smoker | +191% | ||
| 7 | ๐ Shopping | +189% | ||
| 8 | ๐ Table tennis | +182% | ||
| 9 | ๐ Running | +170% | ||
| 10 | ๐ง Trance music | +167% | ||
| 11 | ๐ In a relationship | +163% | ||
| 12 | ๐งผ Clean freak | +162% | ||
| 13 | ๐ Surfing | +148% | ||
| 14 | โท Skiing | +144% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฝ Libertarian politics | +144% | ||
| 16 | ๐จโ๐ค Partying | +142% | ||
| 17 | โฌ๏ธ Has no tattoos | +138% | ||
| 18 | ๐ Pescetarian | +131% | ||
| 19 | ๐ด Cycling | +122% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฅ Vegan | +115% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฅ Hard boiled eggs | +115% | ||
| 22 | ๐ Motorcycling | +113% | ||
| 23 | ๐ Backpacking | +113% | ||
| 24 | ๐บ Beer | +110% | ||
| 25 | ๐จ๐ณ Chinese food | +110% | ||
| 26 | ๐ 420 | +109% | ||
| 27 | ๐ Vanlife | +108% | ||
| 28 | ๐ Staying up late | +106% | ||
| 29 | ๐ซ Not religious | +103% | ||
| 30 | โฐ Climbing | +103% | n=32,353 | |
Attractiveness is based on the proportion of people liking or disliking a person based on their photo on Nomads.com's dating app. That does NOT mean people like or dislike specific traits. It's that people who are rated as unattractive are more likely to have selected these traits on their profile. TL;DR unattractive people have specific traits, but those specific traits don't necessarily make you unattractive.
๐ FetLife
๐ Vintage
๐ Fashion
๐ซ Teetotaler
๐ Makeup
๐ Jewelry
๐จโ Most unattractive men's traits |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | ๐ FetLife | -2,571% | ||
| 2 | ๐ Vintage | -1,127% | ||
| 3 | ๐ Fashion | -947% | ||
| 4 | ๐ซ Teetotaler | -658% | ||
| 5 | ๐ Makeup | -550% | ||
| 6 | ๐ Jewelry | -297% | ||
| 7 | ๐ช Skydiving | -241% | ||
| 8 | ๐ถ Ceramics | -189% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฐ๐ท K-pop music | -185% | ||
| 10 | ๐ง Garage music | -112% | ||
| 11 | ๐ Bodyboarding | -80% | ||
| 12 | ๐ถโ๐ซ๏ธ Hang gliding | -77% | ||
| 13 | ๐ณ Bowling | -74% | ||
| 14 | ๐ญ Swinging | -70% | ||
| 15 | ๐ช Paragliding | -41% | ||
| 16 | ๐ง Trance music | -38% | ||
| 17 | ๐ Cricket | -29% | ||
| 18 | ๐จโ๐ฆฒ Bald | -26% | ||
| 19 | ๐ Single | -25% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฉ Samoyeds | -24% | ||
| 21 | ๐ Motorcycling | -22% | ||
| 22 | ๐ Urbex | -19% | ||
| 23 | ๐ Sex positive | -18% | ||
| 24 | ๐ป Gardening | -10% | ||
| 25 | ๐ Kink | -8% | ||
| 26 | ๐ Paleo | -7% | ||
| 27 | ๐ Shopping | -7% | ||
| 28 | ๐ Dancing | -6% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฑ Pool | -6% | ||
| 30 | ๐ Religious | -5% | n=32,353 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Most unattractive women's traits |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | ๐ฅ Messy | -2,161% | ||
| 2 | ๐ธ Anime | -1,389% | ||
| 3 | ๐ข Slowmad | -1,030% | ||
| 4 | ๐ง Pessimist | -1,003% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฌ Daily smoker | -1,003% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฆ Still water | -892% | ||
| 7 | ๐ง Bouldering | -865% | ||
| 8 | ๐ด Conservative politics | -644% | ||
| 9 | ๐งฌ Longevity | -644% | ||
| 10 | ๐ค Podcast | -507% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฆ Sparkling water | -507% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฌ Snapchat | -424% | ||
| 13 | ๐ Fashion | -424% | ||
| 14 | ๐ Nails | -396% | ||
| 15 | ๐ต๐ท Reggaeton music | -341% | ||
| 16 | ๐ Vintage | -314% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฌ TikTok | -314% | ||
| 18 | ๐ Creatine | -286% | ||
| 19 | ๐ FetLife | -231% | ||
| 20 | ๐ถ Pottery | -231% | ||
| 21 | ๐๏ธ Live in the mountains | -203% | ||
| 22 | ๐งถ Knitting | -148% | ||
| 23 | โจ Believe in astrology | -129% | ||
| 24 | ๐ Pickleball | -121% | ||
| 25 | ๐ Jewelry | -121% | ||
| 26 | ๐ High heels | -121% | ||
| 27 | ๐ Field hockey | -93% | ||
| 28 | โฑ๏ธ Luxury brands | -93% | ||
| 29 | ๐ Basketball | -93% | ||
| 30 | ๐ช Fight sports | -63% | n=32,353 | |
Attractiveness is based on the proportion of people liking or disliking a person based on their photo on Nomads.com's dating app. That does NOT mean people like or dislike specific jobs. It's that people who are rated as attractive are more likely to work in speciifc industries. TL;DR hot people work in specific industries, but those specific industries don't necessarily make you hot (you could always try though).
๐ฑ Mobile Dev
๐ Recruitment
๐จ Artist
๐ค Community
๐ SaaS
๐จ UI/UX Design
๐จโ Attractive men's jobs |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | ๐จ Artist | +142% | ||
| 2 | ๐จโโ๏ธ Medical | +76% | ||
| 3 | ๐ Recruitment | +68% | ||
| 4 | ๐ SaaS | +61% | ||
| 5 | ๐จ UI/UX Design | +57% | ||
| 6 | ๐ธ Model | +52% | ||
| 7 | ๐ค Consulting | +51% | ||
| 8 | ๐ Logistics | +47% | ||
| 9 | ๐ Coach | +45% | ||
| 10 | ๐ค Product Manager | +42% | ||
| 11 | ๐ค AI model | +41% | ||
| 12 | ๐ Ecommerce | +40% | ||
| 13 | ๐ง Psychologist | +35% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฑ Mobile Dev | +31% | ||
| 15 | ๐ Startup Founder | +31% | ||
| 16 | ๐ Dev Ops | +31% | ||
| 17 | ๐ Marketing | +31% | ||
| 18 | ๐ Investor | +30% | ||
| 19 | ๐ช Fitness | +30% | ||
| 20 | ๐ป Software Dev | +27% | ||
| 21 | ๐ Data | +27% | ||
| 22 | ๐ค Sales | +26% | ||
| 23 | ๐ Engineering | +26% | ||
| 24 | ๐พ Game Dev | +25% | ||
| 25 | ๐ VR Dev | +21% | ||
| 26 | ๐ค Community | +21% | ||
| 27 | ๐ธ Web Dev | +20% | ||
| 28 | ๐ Sports | +17% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฐ Finance | +12% | ||
| 30 | ๐จโ๐ซ Education | +12% | n=32,353 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Attractive women's jobs |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | ๐ฑ Mobile Dev | +165% | ||
| 2 | ๐ Recruitment | +123% | ||
| 3 | ๐ค Community | +112% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฉโ๐จ Creative | +86% | ||
| 5 | ๐ช Fitness | +77% | ||
| 6 | ๐ป Software Dev | +72% | ||
| 7 | ๐ Startup Founder | +68% | ||
| 8 | ๐ Coach | +68% | ||
| 9 | ๐จโ๐ซ Education | +65% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฐ Journalism | +57% | ||
| 11 | ๐จ UI/UX Design | +57% | ||
| 12 | ๐ Blogging | +56% | ||
| 13 | ๐ SaaS | +55% | ||
| 14 | ๐ Marketing | +46% | ||
| 15 | ๐ Ecommerce | +38% | ||
| 16 | ๐ธ Web Dev | +38% | ||
| 17 | ๐ค Product Manager | +36% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฐ Finance | +20% | n=32,353 | |
Attractiveness is based on the proportion of people liking or disliking a person based on their photo on Nomads.com's dating app. That does NOT mean people like or dislike specific jobs. It's that people who are rated as unattractive are more likely to have selected these jobs on their profile. TL;DR unattractive people have specific jobs, but those specific jobs don't necessarily make you unattractive.
๐ฉ Politics
โ๏ธ Aviation
๐พ Farm life
๐ฅ Healthcare
๐จ Stay-at-home dad
๐ช Military
๐จโ Most unattractive men's jobs |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | โ๏ธ Aviation | -947% | ||
| 2 | ๐พ Farm life | -730% | ||
| 3 | ๐จ Stay-at-home dad | -514% | ||
| 4 | ๐ช Military | -478% | ||
| 5 | ๐ณ Chef | -405% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฉ Politics | -114% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฅ Healthcare | -102% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฉโ๐ผ Law | -96% | ||
| 9 | ๐ก Architecture | -67% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฐ Journalism | -63% | ||
| 11 | ๐ Real estate | -61% | ||
| 12 | ๐ถ Adult | -21% | ||
| 13 | ๐บ Geo | -15% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฌ Science | -12% | ||
| 15 | ๐ Unemployed | -12% | ||
| 16 | ๐ Hospitality | -5% | ||
| 17 | ๐ Support | -1% | n=32,353 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Most unattractive women's jobs |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | ๐ฉ Politics | -1,389% | ||
| 2 | ๐จ Artist | -700% | ||
| 3 | ๐ VR Dev | -644% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฅ Healthcare | -424% | ||
| 5 | ๐ Real estate | -341% | ||
| 6 | ๐ต Music | -314% | ||
| 7 | ๐ค AI model | -314% | ||
| 8 | ๐ Investor | -286% | ||
| 9 | ๐ผ Retired | -176% | ||
| 10 | ๐ก๏ธ InfoSec | -176% | ||
| 11 | ๐ Hospitality | -151% | ||
| 12 | ๐ Support | -37% | ||
| 13 | ๐น Content Creator | -35% | ||
| 14 | ๐ Data | -33% | ||
| 15 | ๐ Sports | -31% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฉโ๐ผ Law | -21% | ||
| 17 | ๐ค Sales | -21% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฐ Crypto | -13% | ||
| 19 | ๐บ Geo | -8% | n=32,353 | |
๐จโ Where attractive men travel to |
||||
| # | City | Attractiveness | ||
| 1 | ๐ฌ๐ท Mykonos | 5 | ||
| 2 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Uluwatu | 4.67 | ||
| 3 | ๐ธ๐ช Malmรถ | 4.67 | ||
| 4 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Christchurch | 4.64 | ||
| 5 | ๐ช๐ธ Ibiza | 4.56 | ||
| 6 | ๐ต๐น Ericeira | 4.56 | ||
| 7 | ๐จ๐ท Tamarindo | 4.55 | ||
| 8 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Utrecht | 4.49 | ||
| 9 | ๐ณ๐ด Bergen | 4.48 | ||
| 10 | ๐ญ๐ท Zadar | 4.46 | ||
| 11 | ๐บ๐ธ Boston | 4.45 | ||
| 12 | ๐ฆ๐บ Brisbane | 4.45 | ||
| 13 | ๐ช๐ธ Fuerteventura | 4.44 | ||
| 14 | ๐ต๐น Portimรฃo | 4.41 | ||
| 15 | ๐ฆ๐น Salzburg | 4.39 | ||
| 16 | ๐บ๐ธ Honolulu | 4.37 | ||
| 17 | ๐ฎ๐ธ Reykjavik | 4.37 | ||
| 18 | ๐ง๐ฆ Sarajevo | 4.37 | ||
| 19 | ๐ช๐ธ Mallorca | 4.37 | ||
| 20 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Queenstown | 4.35 | ||
| 21 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cabo San Lucas | 4.34 | ||
| 22 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Lanta | 4.34 | ||
| 23 | ๐ฆ๐บ Melbourne | 4.32 | ||
| 24 | ๐ฎ๐น Catania | 4.32 | ||
| 25 | ๐ฌ๐ท Santorini | 4.31 | ||
| 26 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Auckland | 4.31 | ||
| 27 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Marrakesh | 4.31 | ||
| 28 | ๐จ๐ญ Zurich | 4.28 | ||
| 29 | ๐ฒ๐น Sliema | 4.28 | ||
| 30 | ๐ฒ๐พ Langkawi | 4.27 | Based on attractiveness of visitors n=428,982 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Where attractive women travel to |
||||
| # | City | Attractiveness | ||
| 1 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Phi Phi | 5 | ||
| 2 | ๐บ๐ธ Orlando | 4.87 | ||
| 3 | ๐ญ๐ท Zadar | 4.82 | ||
| 4 | ๐ต๐ฑ Gdansk | 4.8 | ||
| 5 | ๐ต๐ฑ Wrocลaw | 4.79 | ||
| 6 | ๐ฎ๐น Genoa | 4.77 | ||
| 7 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Galle | 4.69 | ||
| 8 | ๐ป๐ณ Nha Trang | 4.69 | ||
| 9 | ๐ฉ๐ช Dresden | 4.68 | ||
| 10 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Pha Ngan | 4.6 | ||
| 11 | ๐ท๐บ Moscow | 4.6 | ||
| 12 | ๐จ๐ฑ Valparaรญso | 4.59 | ||
| 13 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Samui | 4.59 | ||
| 14 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Rotterdam | 4.59 | ||
| 15 | ๐ป๐ณ Da Lat | 4.59 | ||
| 16 | ๐บ๐ฆ Kyiv | 4.58 | ||
| 17 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Uluwatu | 4.58 | ||
| 18 | ๐ฉ๐ด Punta Cana | 4.58 | ||
| 19 | ๐ฎ๐ฑ Tel Aviv | 4.56 | ||
| 20 | ๐ช๐ธ Fuerteventura | 4.55 | ||
| 21 | ๐ฑ๐น Vilnius | 4.55 | ||
| 22 | ๐ฆ๐บ Cairns | 4.54 | ||
| 23 | ๐ฌ๐ท Mykonos | 4.53 | ||
| 24 | ๐ฒ๐ช Budva | 4.53 | ||
| 25 | ๐ฌ๐ท Rhodes | 4.53 | ||
| 26 | ๐ท๐บ Saint Petersburg | 4.53 | ||
| 27 | ๐ต๐ฑ Warsaw | 4.53 | ||
| 28 | ๐บ๐ธ Chicago | 4.52 | ||
| 29 | ๐ฌ๐ช Batumi | 4.52 | ||
| 30 | ๐ฎ๐น Amalfi | 4.52 | Based on attractiveness of visitors n=428,982 | |
๐จโ Where unattractive men travel to |
||||
| # | City | Attractiveness | ||
| 1 | ๐น๐ญ Pattaya | 3.29 | ||
| 2 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Goa | 3.41 | ||
| 3 | ๐ป๐ณ Phu Quoc | 3.41 | ||
| 4 | ๐ฑ๐ฆ Vientiane | 3.5 | ||
| 5 | ๐ฒ๐ฉ Chisinau | 3.5 | ||
| 6 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Bengaluru | 3.52 | ||
| 7 | ๐ฒ๐ช Podgorica | 3.52 | ||
| 8 | ๐ฆ๐ท Cordoba | 3.55 | ||
| 9 | ๐ฌ๐ช Batumi | 3.56 | ||
| 10 | ๐ณ๐ต Kathmandu | 3.57 | ||
| 11 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Phnom Penh | 3.59 | ||
| 12 | ๐ด๐ฒ Muscat | 3.59 | ||
| 13 | ๐ฎ๐ฑ Jerusalem | 3.61 | ||
| 14 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Mumbai | 3.61 | ||
| 15 | ๐บ๐ฆ Lviv | 3.62 | ||
| 16 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Almaty | 3.62 | ||
| 17 | ๐ต๐พ Asuncion | 3.62 | ||
| 18 | ๐ฏ๐ต Hiroshima | 3.65 | ||
| 19 | ๐ฉ๐ช Dusseldorf | 3.65 | ||
| 20 | ๐ช๐ฌ Cairo | 3.65 | ||
| 21 | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama City | 3.65 | ||
| 22 | ๐ช๐ธ Alicante | 3.65 | ||
| 23 | ๐ช๐ธ Bilbao | 3.66 | ||
| 24 | ๐ฎ๐น Turin | 3.67 | ||
| 25 | ๐ต๐ฑ Gdansk | 3.67 | ||
| 26 | ๐ต๐ฑ Wrocลaw | 3.67 | ||
| 27 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Rotterdam | 3.68 | ||
| 28 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Kuta | 3.68 | ||
| 29 | ๐ฏ๐ต Fukuoka | 3.68 | ||
| 30 | ๐บ๐ธ Seattle | 3.68 | Based on unattractiveness of visitors n=428,982 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Where unattractive women travel to |
||||
| # | City | Attractiveness | ||
| 1 | ๐ช๐จ Quito | 3.16 | ||
| 2 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Wellington | 3.2 | ||
| 3 | ๐ฐ๐ช Nairobi | 3.32 | ||
| 4 | ๐จ๐ณ Macau | 3.34 | ||
| 5 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Weligama | 3.37 | ||
| 6 | ๐ฏ๐ต Hiroshima | 3.38 | ||
| 7 | ๐ฏ๐ต Fukuoka | 3.4 | ||
| 8 | ๐ต๐ท San Juan | 3.41 | ||
| 9 | ๐ฆ๐บ Perth | 3.44 | ||
| 10 | ๐ฏ๐ด Amman | 3.5 | ||
| 11 | ๐จ๐ณ Shenzhen | 3.51 | ||
| 12 | ๐จ๐ด Santa Marta | 3.53 | ||
| 13 | ๐ช๐จ Cuenca | 3.55 | ||
| 14 | ๐จ๐ฆ Quebec City | 3.56 | ||
| 15 | ๐ต๐พ Asuncion | 3.56 | ||
| 16 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Merida | 3.57 | ||
| 17 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | 3.6 | ||
| 18 | ๐จ๐ด Bogota | 3.61 | ||
| 19 | ๐ฉ๐ด Santo Domingo | 3.62 | ||
| 20 | ๐ฏ๐ฒ Montego Bay | 3.65 | ||
| 21 | ๐ซ๐ท Lyon | 3.66 | ||
| 22 | ๐ฑ๐ฆ Vientiane | 3.66 | ||
| 23 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cozumel | 3.67 | ||
| 24 | ๐ง๐ฆ Sarajevo | 3.67 | ||
| 25 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Queenstown | 3.67 | ||
| 26 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Phnom Penh | 3.68 | ||
| 27 | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama City | 3.68 | ||
| 28 | ๐ฌ๐ง Glasgow | 3.68 | ||
| 29 | ๐ฐ๐ท Jeju Island | 3.69 | ||
| 30 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bansko | 3.7 | Based on unattractiveness of visitors n=428,982 | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city (locals excluded) who hold a ๐ graduate degree (a Master's or PhD), based on the highest degree they selected on their profile. Adjusted for sample size so cities with few visitors don't dominate.
๐ Where the most educated people travel to |
||||
| # | City | Graduate degree | ||
| 1 | ๐จ๐พ Larnaca | 47% | ||
| 2 | ๐ง๐พ Minsk | 46% | ||
| 3 | ๐บ๐ธ Boston | 45% | ||
| 4 | ๐ต๐น Madeira | 45% | ||
| 5 | ๐ต๐ฑ Wrocลaw | 43% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฑ๐บ Luxembourg | 43% | ||
| 7 | ๐ช๐ธ Fuerteventura | 43% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฑ๐ง Beirut | 43% | ||
| 9 | ๐ท๐ด Brasov | 43% | ||
| 10 | ๐บ๐ธ Seattle | 43% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฒ๐ฉ Chisinau | 43% | ||
| 12 | ๐จ๐พ Limassol | 43% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Taghazout | 43% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Weligama | 42% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฆ๐ฉ Andorra la Vella | 42% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฌ๐ช Batumi | 42% | ||
| 17 | ๐ต๐น Azores | 42% | ||
| 18 | ๐ช๐ช Tallinn | 42% | ||
| 19 | ๐จ๐ฆ Montreal | 42% | ||
| 20 | ๐ณ๐ฑ The Hague | 42% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฐ๐ฌ Bishkek | 42% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฉ๐ด Santo Domingo | 42% | ||
| 23 | ๐จ๐ญ Geneva | 42% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฌ๐ท Thessaloniki | 42% | ||
| 25 | ๐ฑ๐ป Riga | 42% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Yerevan | 42% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฎ๐น Genoa | 41% | ||
| 28 | ๐ธ๐ฎ Ljubljana | 41% | ||
| 29 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bansko | 41% | ||
| 30 | ๐ง๐ท Florianopolis | 41% | Share of visiting nomads with a graduate degree n=122,199 nomads | |
๐ Where the least educated people travel to |
||||
| # | City | Graduate degree | ||
| 1 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cabo San Lucas | 26% | ||
| 2 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Phi Phi | 27% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Tangier | 27% | ||
| 4 | ๐จ๐ท Tamarindo | 28% | ||
| 5 | ๐น๐ญ Krabi | 28% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Guadalajara | 29% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Sayulita | 29% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Miguel de Allende | 30% | ||
| 9 | ๐จ๐ณ Guangzhou | 30% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Jakarta | 31% | ||
| 11 | ๐น๐ญ Ao Nang | 31% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Seminyak | 31% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฌ๐น Antigua | 31% | ||
| 14 | ๐น๐ญ Pattaya | 31% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฏ๐ต Hiroshima | 31% | ||
| 16 | ๐ป๐ณ Hue | 31% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฏ๐ต Osaka | 31% | ||
| 18 | ๐จ๐ท Santa Teresa | 32% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฌ๐ท Mykonos | 32% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฆ๐บ Perth | 32% | ||
| 21 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Utrecht | 32% | ||
| 22 | ๐ป๐ณ Da Nang | 32% | ||
| 23 | ๐น๐ญ Pai | 32% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Cristรณbal de las Casas | 32% | ||
| 25 | ๐ช๐ธ San Sebastian | 32% | ||
| 26 | ๐น๐ผ Taipei | 32% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | 32% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฆ๐บ Brisbane | 32% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฑ๐ฆ Vientiane | 32% | ||
| 30 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | 32% | Share of visiting nomads with a graduate degree n=122,199 nomads | |
Median age of the visiting nomads who travel to each city (people who live there are excluded), based on the birth date on their profile.
๐ฃ Youngest visiting nomads | ||||
| # | City | Median age | ||
| 1 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Almaty | 33 yrs | ||
| 2 | ๐บ๐ฟ Tashkent | 33 yrs | ||
| 3 | ๐น๐ท Ankara | 33 yrs | ||
| 4 | ๐ฎ๐น Pisa | 33 yrs | ||
| 5 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Uluwatu | 34 yrs | ||
| 6 | ๐ต๐ฑ Warsaw | 34 yrs | ||
| 7 | ๐ต๐ญ Siargao | 34 yrs | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐ณ Chengdu | 34 yrs | ||
| 9 | ๐จ๐ณ Guangzhou | 34 yrs | ||
| 10 | ๐ฌ๐ช Batumi | 34 yrs | ||
| 11 | ๐น๐ท Antalya | 34 yrs | ||
| 12 | ๐บ๐ธ Minneapolis | 34 yrs | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Taghazout | 34 yrs | ||
| 14 | ๐จ๐ฟ Brno | 34 yrs | ||
| 15 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Yerevan | 34 yrs | ||
| 16 | ๐ถ๐ฆ Doha | 34 yrs | ||
| 17 | ๐ฎ๐น Milan | 34 yrs | ||
| 18 | ๐ฆ๐ท Bariloche | 34 yrs | ||
| 19 | ๐ฌ๐ช Kutaisi | 34 yrs | ||
| 20 | ๐บ๐ธ Raleigh | 34 yrs | ||
| 21 | ๐ธ๐ช Gothenburg | 34 yrs | ||
| 22 | ๐บ๐ธ Asheville | 34 yrs | ||
| 23 | ๐ฌ๐ง Oxford | 34 yrs | ||
| 24 | ๐บ๐ธ Detroit | 34 yrs | ||
| 25 | ๐บ๐ธ Charlotte | 34 yrs | ||
| 26 | ๐บ๐ธ Phoenix | 34 yrs | ||
| 27 | ๐ฌ๐ง Cambridge | 34 yrs | ||
| 28 | ๐ฒ๐ป Male | 34 yrs | ||
| 29 | ๐ซ๐ท Chamonix | 34 yrs | ||
| 30 | ๐ป๐ฆ Vatican City | 34 yrs | Median age of visiting nomads (locals excluded)n=199,713 nomads | |
๐ง Oldest visiting nomads | ||||
| # | City | Median age | ||
| 1 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Miguel de Allende | 41 yrs | ||
| 2 | ๐ง๐ท Recife | 40 yrs | ||
| 3 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puebla | 39 yrs | ||
| 4 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Wellington | 39 yrs | ||
| 5 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Hyderabad | 39 yrs | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐ฒ Yangon | 38 yrs | ||
| 7 | ๐น๐ญ Hua Hin | 38 yrs | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐ท Puerto Viejo | 38 yrs | ||
| 9 | ๐บ๐ธ St. Louis | 38 yrs | ||
| 10 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Merida | 38 yrs | ||
| 11 | ๐ง๐ท Fortaleza | 38 yrs | ||
| 12 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Lanta | 38 yrs | ||
| 13 | ๐ช๐จ Cuenca | 38 yrs | ||
| 14 | ๐จ๐ฆ Quebec City | 37.5 yrs | ||
| 15 | ๐ฎ๐ช Galway | 37.5 yrs | ||
| 16 | ๐ช๐ธ San Sebastian | 37.5 yrs | ||
| 17 | ๐บ๐ธ Tampa | 37.5 yrs | ||
| 18 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puerto Vallarta | 37 yrs | ||
| 19 | ๐ฑ๐ง Beirut | 37 yrs | ||
| 20 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Sayulita | 37 yrs | ||
| 21 | ๐ฌ๐ง Belfast | 37 yrs | ||
| 22 | ๐ง๐ธ Nassau | 37 yrs | ||
| 23 | ๐ซ๐ท Montpellier | 37 yrs | ||
| 24 | ๐ช๐ธ Tarifa | 37 yrs | ||
| 25 | ๐ฆ๐ฉ Andorra la Vella | 37 yrs | ||
| 26 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Isla Mujeres | 37 yrs | ||
| 27 | ๐ฌ๐ฎ Gibraltar | 37 yrs | ||
| 28 | ๐ต๐ฆ Bocas del Toro | 37 yrs | ||
| 29 | ๐จ๐ฑ Valparaรญso | 37 yrs | ||
| 30 | ๐ช๐ธ Granada | 37 yrs | Median age of visiting nomads (locals excluded)n=199,713 nomads | |
Median self-reported yearly income of the visiting nomads who travel to each city (locals excluded). The median is used so a few very large numbers can’t skew it.
๐ฐ Highest-earning visitors | ||||
| # | City | Median income | ||
| 1 | ๐จ๐ฆ Vancouver | $125,000 | ||
| 2 | ๐ฏ๐ต Tokyo | $100,000 | ||
| 3 | ๐บ๐ธ New York City | $100,000 | ||
| 4 | ๐ฉ๐ฐ Copenhagen | $100,000 | ||
| 5 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ Cape Town | $100,000 | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | $100,000 | ||
| 7 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Auckland | $100,000 | ||
| 8 | ๐ธ๐ฎ Ljubljana | $100,000 | ||
| 9 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Delhi | $100,000 | ||
| 10 | ๐ง๐ท Rio de Janeiro | $100,000 | ||
| 11 | ๐ฆ๐บ Sydney | $100,000 | ||
| 12 | ๐บ๐ธ Boston | $100,000 | ||
| 13 | ๐น๐ผ Taipei | $100,000 | ||
| 14 | ๐ฆ๐ท Buenos Aires | $100,000 | ||
| 15 | ๐จ๐ฆ Montreal | $100,000 | ||
| 16 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Marrakesh | $100,000 | ||
| 17 | ๐บ๐ธ Austin | $100,000 | ||
| 18 | ๐ธ๐ช Stockholm | $100,000 | ||
| 19 | ๐จ๐ด Bogota | $100,000 | ||
| 20 | ๐จ๐ฆ Toronto | $100,000 | ||
| 21 | ๐บ๐ธ Miami | $100,000 | ||
| 22 | ๐ฏ๐ต Kyoto | $100,000 | ||
| 23 | ๐จ๐ญ Zurich | $100,000 | ||
| 24 | ๐ง๐ท Florianopolis | $100,000 | ||
| 25 | ๐จ๐ด Medellรญn | $100,000 | ||
| 26 | ๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong | $100,000 | ||
| 27 | ๐จ๐ญ Geneva | $100,000 | ||
| 28 | ๐ฆ๐ช Dubai | $100,000 | ||
| 29 | ๐ฎ๐ธ Reykjavik | $100,000 | ||
| 30 | ๐บ๐ธ San Francisco | $100,000 | Median self-reported income of visiting nomadsn=46,507 nomads | |
๐ช Lowest-earning visitors | ||||
| # | City | Median income | ||
| 1 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Yerevan | $70,000 | ||
| 2 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Almaty | $70,000 | ||
| 3 | ๐ต๐ญ Cebu | $70,000 | ||
| 4 | ๐ฌ๐ช Batumi | $70,000 | ||
| 5 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Phnom Penh | $72,500 | ||
| 6 | ๐น๐ญ Pattaya | $75,000 | ||
| 7 | ๐ป๐ณ Hoi An | $75,000 | ||
| 8 | ๐น๐ท Antalya | $75,000 | ||
| 9 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Pha Ngan | $75,000 | ||
| 10 | ๐ฒ๐พ Penang | $75,000 | ||
| 11 | ๐ฒ๐ฐ Skopje | $75,000 | ||
| 12 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bansko | $75,000 | ||
| 13 | ๐ฐ๐ท Busan | $75,000 | ||
| 14 | ๐ฌ๐ช Tbilisi | $75,000 | ||
| 15 | ๐ป๐ณ Da Nang | $75,000 | ||
| 16 | ๐ฒ๐พ Kuala Lumpur | $75,000 | ||
| 17 | ๐ป๐ฆ Vatican City | $80,000 | ||
| 18 | ๐ฑ๐บ Luxembourg | $80,000 | ||
| 19 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Tao | $80,000 | ||
| 20 | ๐ช๐ธ Tenerife | $80,000 | ||
| 21 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | $80,000 | ||
| 22 | ๐น๐ญ Phuket | $80,000 | ||
| 23 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Lanta | $80,000 | ||
| 24 | ๐ท๐ธ Belgrade | $80,000 | ||
| 25 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Jakarta | $80,000 | ||
| 26 | ๐ฏ๐ต Fukuoka | $80,000 | ||
| 27 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Siem Reap | $80,000 | ||
| 28 | ๐ป๐ณ Hanoi | $80,000 | ||
| 29 | ๐น๐ญ Krabi | $80,000 | ||
| 30 | ๐น๐ท Istanbul | $80,000 | Median self-reported income of visiting nomadsn=46,507 nomads | |
Among the nomads who travel to each city, the chance that two random visitors come from different countries — higher means a more internationally mixed crowd of visitors.
๐ Most international crowd | ||||
| # | City | Nationality mix | ||
| 1 | ๐บ๐ธ Denver | 96% | ||
| 2 | ๐บ๐ธ San Francisco | 96% | ||
| 3 | ๐บ๐ธ New York City | 96% | ||
| 4 | ๐บ๐ธ Houston | 95% | ||
| 5 | ๐บ๐ธ Washington | 95% | ||
| 6 | ๐บ๐ธ Boston | 95% | ||
| 7 | ๐บ๐ธ Los Angeles | 95% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฒ๐พ Langkawi | 95% | ||
| 9 | ๐บ๐ธ Las Vegas | 95% | ||
| 10 | ๐บ๐ธ Miami | 95% | ||
| 11 | ๐บ๐ธ Chicago | 95% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Weligama | 95% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Gili Trawangan | 95% | ||
| 14 | ๐จ๐ฟ Brno | 95% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | 95% | ||
| 16 | ๐ช๐ธ Tenerife | 94% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฌ๐ช Kutaisi | 94% | ||
| 18 | ๐บ๐ธ Seattle | 94% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Uluwatu | 94% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฆ๐ช Abu Dhabi | 94% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Denpasar | 94% | ||
| 22 | ๐ช๐ฌ Dahab | 94% | ||
| 23 | ๐บ๐ธ San Diego | 94% | ||
| 24 | ๐น๐ญ Hua Hin | 94% | ||
| 25 | ๐ฆ๐ช Dubai | 94% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฌ๐ท Rhodes | 94% | ||
| 27 | ๐ง๐ฌ Varna | 94% | ||
| 28 | ๐บ๐ธ New Orleans | 94% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Kuta | 94% | ||
| 30 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Samui | 93% | How mixed the visiting nomads’ nationalities aren=164,064 nomads | |
๐ Least international crowd | ||||
| # | City | Nationality mix | ||
| 1 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cabo San Lucas | 41% | ||
| 2 | ๐ต๐ท San Juan | 47% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Miguel de Allende | 47% | ||
| 4 | ๐ช๐จ Cuenca | 55% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Sayulita | 56% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puerto Vallarta | 58% | ||
| 7 | ๐ง๐ธ Nassau | 64% | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐ท Tamarindo | 65% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cozumel | 67% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Guadalajara | 69% | ||
| 11 | ๐จ๐ท Santa Teresa | 70% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฌ๐น Antigua | 71% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฌ๐น Guatemala City | 72% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | 72% | ||
| 15 | ๐ช๐จ Quito | 72% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Merida | 73% | ||
| 17 | ๐จ๐ด Medellรญn | 74% | ||
| 18 | ๐จ๐ฆ Vancouver | 75% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Oaxaca | 75% | ||
| 20 | ๐ณ๐ฎ San Juan del Sur | 75% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Tulum | 76% | ||
| 22 | ๐จ๐ฆ Quebec City | 76% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฎ๐น Amalfi | 76% | ||
| 24 | ๐ต๐ฆ Bocas del Toro | 76% | ||
| 25 | ๐จ๐ท San Josรฉ | 76% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฎ๐ธ Reykjavik | 76% | ||
| 27 | ๐ธ๐ป San Salvador | 77% | ||
| 28 | ๐จ๐ฆ Calgary | 77% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Playa del Carmen | 78% | ||
| 30 | ๐จ๐ด Cartagena | 78% | How mixed the visiting nomads’ nationalities aren=164,064 nomads | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who work as software, web or mobile developers (of those who shared their profession).
๐จโ๐ป Most developer-heavy visitors | ||||
| # | City | Developers | ||
| 1 | ๐ฌ๐ช Batumi | 67% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Almaty | 67% | ||
| 3 | ๐บ๐ฟ Tashkent | 63% | ||
| 4 | ๐จ๐พ Larnaca | 63% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฐ๐ฌ Bishkek | 63% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Yerevan | 62% | ||
| 7 | ๐ท๐ด Cluj | 62% | ||
| 8 | ๐ง๐พ Minsk | 62% | ||
| 9 | ๐ต๐ฑ Wrocลaw | 61% | ||
| 10 | ๐น๐ผ Kaohsiung | 61% | ||
| 11 | ๐ป๐ณ Da Lat | 61% | ||
| 12 | ๐ซ๐ท Lyon | 61% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Denpasar | 61% | ||
| 14 | ๐น๐ท Antalya | 61% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฏ๐ต Hiroshima | 61% | ||
| 16 | ๐น๐ญ Pattaya | 60% | ||
| 17 | ๐ท๐ธ Novi Sad | 60% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฏ๐ต Fukuoka | 60% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฏ๐ต Osaka | 60% | ||
| 20 | ๐บ๐ธ San Francisco | 59% | ||
| 21 | ๐ต๐ฑ Krakรณw | 59% | ||
| 22 | ๐ป๐ณ Phu Quoc | 59% | ||
| 23 | ๐บ๐ธ Orlando | 59% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Bengaluru | 59% | ||
| 25 | ๐ฌ๐ช Tbilisi | 59% | ||
| 26 | ๐ท๐ธ Belgrade | 59% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฒ๐พ Langkawi | 59% | ||
| 28 | ๐ท๐บ Moscow | 59% | ||
| 29 | ๐ง๐ช Antwerp | 59% | ||
| 30 | ๐ณ๐ด Oslo | 59% | Share of visiting nomads who are developersn=151,804 nomads | |
๐ด Fewest developers | ||||
| # | City | Developers | ||
| 1 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cabo San Lucas | 36% | ||
| 2 | ๐ง๐ท Salvador | 39% | ||
| 3 | ๐ช๐จ Cuenca | 39% | ||
| 4 | ๐ณ๐ฎ San Juan del Sur | 41% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Tulum | 41% | ||
| 6 | ๐จ๐ด Santa Marta | 42% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฉ๐ด Santo Domingo | 42% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Oaxaca | 42% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Sayulita | 42% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Miguel de Allende | 42% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฌ๐น Antigua | 42% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puerto Vallarta | 42% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Merida | 42% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ Cape Town | 43% | ||
| 15 | ๐จ๐ท Santa Teresa | 43% | ||
| 16 | ๐ช๐ธ San Sebastian | 43% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฑ๐ง Beirut | 44% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฉ๐ด Punta Cana | 44% | ||
| 19 | ๐ต๐ฆ Bocas del Toro | 44% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฏ๐ด Amman | 45% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฆ๐ท El Calafate | 45% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฐ๐ช Nairobi | 45% | ||
| 23 | ๐ช๐จ Quito | 45% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฎ๐น Lake Como | 45% | ||
| 25 | ๐ฆ๐บ Perth | 45% | ||
| 26 | ๐จ๐บ Havana | 45% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Essaouira | 45% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฌ๐ท Mykonos | 45% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Isla Mujeres | 45% | ||
| 30 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bansko | 45% | Share of visiting nomads who are developersn=151,804 nomads | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who are startup founders (of those who shared their profession).
๐ Most founder-heavy visitors | ||||
| # | City | Founders | ||
| 1 | ๐บ๐ธ San Francisco | 47% | ||
| 2 | ๐ช๐ธ Marbella | 46% | ||
| 3 | ๐จ๐ณ Shenzhen | 46% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฎ๐น Lake Como | 45% | ||
| 5 | ๐บ๐ธ Boston | 44% | ||
| 6 | ๐บ๐ธ New Orleans | 44% | ||
| 7 | ๐บ๐ธ Dallas | 43% | ||
| 8 | ๐ด๐ฒ Muscat | 42% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฆ๐บ Perth | 41% | ||
| 10 | ๐บ๐ธ Las Vegas | 41% | ||
| 11 | ๐บ๐ฆ Kyiv | 41% | ||
| 12 | ๐บ๐ธ Los Angeles | 41% | ||
| 13 | ๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong | 40% | ||
| 14 | ๐ซ๐ท Cannes | 40% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฆ๐ช Dubai | 40% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฆ๐ช Abu Dhabi | 40% | ||
| 17 | ๐บ๐ธ New York City | 40% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฒ๐จ Monaco | 40% | ||
| 19 | ๐จ๐ณ Guangzhou | 40% | ||
| 20 | ๐ถ๐ฆ Doha | 39% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฉ๐ช Hamburg | 39% | ||
| 22 | ๐บ๐ธ Washington | 39% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Canggu | 39% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Denpasar | 39% | ||
| 25 | ๐บ๐ธ Seattle | 39% | ||
| 26 | ๐จ๐พ Larnaca | 39% | ||
| 27 | ๐บ๐ธ Denver | 39% | ||
| 28 | ๐ง๐ธ Nassau | 39% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Bengaluru | 39% | ||
| 30 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Goa | 39% | Share of visiting nomads who are foundersn=151,804 nomads | |
๐งโ๐ญ Fewest founders | ||||
| # | City | Founders | ||
| 1 | ๐ฆ๐ท Bariloche | 23% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฆ๐ท El Calafate | 25% | ||
| 3 | ๐ต๐ช Arequipa | 26% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฌ๐ง Glasgow | 27% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Merida | 27% | ||
| 6 | ๐ช๐จ Cuenca | 27% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Guadalajara | 27% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฆ๐ท Mendoza | 27% | ||
| 9 | ๐ง๐ฆ Sarajevo | 27% | ||
| 10 | ๐จ๐ท Puerto Viejo | 27% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฆ๐ฑ Sarandรซ | 27% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puerto Escondido | 27% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Cristรณbal de las Casas | 27% | ||
| 14 | ๐ง๐ฆ Mostar | 27% | ||
| 15 | ๐ช๐ธ Granada | 27% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Oaxaca | 28% | ||
| 17 | ๐ง๐ฌ Plovdiv | 28% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฐ๐ท Busan | 28% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฌ๐ง Liverpool | 28% | ||
| 20 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Christchurch | 28% | ||
| 21 | ๐ช๐จ Quito | 28% | ||
| 22 | ๐จ๐ท Santa Teresa | 28% | ||
| 23 | ๐ต๐ช Cusco | 28% | ||
| 24 | ๐ญ๐ท Zadar | 28% | ||
| 25 | ๐ฆ๐ท Cordoba | 28% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฒ๐ช Kotor | 28% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฉ๐ด Punta Cana | 29% | ||
| 28 | ๐จ๐ด Santa Marta | 29% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฎ๐น Bologna | 29% | ||
| 30 | ๐ง๐ด La Paz | 29% | Share of visiting nomads who are foundersn=151,804 nomads | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city in UI/UX or creative design roles (of those who shared their profession).
๐จ Most designer-heavy visitors | ||||
| # | City | Designers | ||
| 1 | ๐ช๐ธ San Sebastian | 38% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฆ๐บ Perth | 37% | ||
| 3 | ๐บ๐ธ Los Angeles | 35% | ||
| 4 | ๐บ๐ธ Portland | 35% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Essaouira | 35% | ||
| 6 | ๐จ๐ณ Shanghai | 35% | ||
| 7 | ๐ซ๐ท Cannes | 35% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฆ๐บ Melbourne | 35% | ||
| 9 | ๐ง๐ช Antwerp | 34% | ||
| 10 | ๐ช๐ธ Bilbao | 34% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Tangier | 34% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฒ๐พ Penang | 34% | ||
| 13 | ๐ง๐ธ Nassau | 34% | ||
| 14 | ๐ต๐น Faro | 34% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Phnom Penh | 34% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Tulum | 34% | ||
| 17 | ๐บ๐ธ New Orleans | 34% | ||
| 18 | ๐น๐ท Izmir | 33% | ||
| 19 | ๐บ๐ธ San Francisco | 33% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | 33% | ||
| 21 | ๐ซ๐ท Montpellier | 33% | ||
| 22 | ๐จ๐ณ Beijing | 33% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฒ๐พ Langkawi | 33% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฉ๐ช Berlin | 33% | ||
| 25 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Pha Ngan | 33% | ||
| 26 | ๐จ๐ท Puerto Viejo | 33% | ||
| 27 | ๐จ๐ณ Guangzhou | 33% | ||
| 28 | ๐บ๐ธ Dallas | 33% | ||
| 29 | ๐ต๐ญ Siargao | 33% | ||
| 30 | ๐ณ๐ด Tromso | 33% | Share of visiting nomads who are designersn=151,804 nomads | |
๐ง Fewest designers | ||||
| # | City | Designers | ||
| 1 | ๐ต๐พ Asuncion | 19% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฆ๐ท Bariloche | 22% | ||
| 3 | ๐บ๐ธ Denver | 22% | ||
| 4 | ๐จ๐พ Limassol | 22% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฆ๐ท Ushuaia | 23% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฆ๐ฉ Andorra la Vella | 23% | ||
| 7 | ๐ช๐ฌ Dahab | 23% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฒ๐ช Podgorica | 23% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฐ๐ท Jeju Island | 24% | ||
| 10 | ๐ญ๐ท Zadar | 24% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฑ๐น Vilnius | 24% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฆ๐ท El Calafate | 24% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฎ๐น Verona | 24% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Almaty | 24% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฌ๐ท Rhodes | 24% | ||
| 16 | ๐ง๐ท Foz do Iguaรงu | 24% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฉ๐ด Santo Domingo | 24% | ||
| 18 | ๐ง๐พ Minsk | 24% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฑ๐บ Luxembourg | 25% | ||
| 20 | ๐จ๐พ Paphos | 25% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฆ๐ฟ Baku | 25% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Sanur | 25% | ||
| 23 | ๐ธ๐ช Gothenburg | 25% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฆ๐ท Mendoza | 25% | ||
| 25 | ๐บ๐ธ Atlanta | 25% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Yerevan | 25% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฌ๐ช Tbilisi | 25% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Casablanca | 25% | ||
| 29 | ๐บ๐พ Montevideo | 25% | ||
| 30 | ๐จ๐พ Larnaca | 25% | Share of visiting nomads who are designersn=151,804 nomads | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who lift — gym, strength training and Crossfit (casual running, cycling and yoga are not counted).
๐ช Fittest visiting nomads | ||||
| # | City | Gym / strength | ||
| 1 | ๐ต๐น Ericeira | 56% | ||
| 2 | ๐จ๐ด Medellรญn | 52% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Uluwatu | 52% | ||
| 4 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Samui | 50% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Playa del Carmen | 50% | ||
| 6 | ๐ต๐ญ Siargao | 50% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฉ๐ด Santo Domingo | 50% | ||
| 8 | ๐ง๐ท Florianopolis | 50% | ||
| 9 | ๐จ๐ด Cali | 50% | ||
| 10 | ๐จ๐ท Santa Teresa | 50% | ||
| 11 | ๐ถ๐ฆ Doha | 50% | ||
| 12 | ๐น๐ญ Krabi | 49% | ||
| 13 | ๐จ๐ท Tamarindo | 49% | ||
| 14 | ๐ง๐ท Rio de Janeiro | 49% | ||
| 15 | ๐ญ๐ท Hvar | 49% | ||
| 16 | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama City | 49% | ||
| 17 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Pha Ngan | 49% | ||
| 18 | ๐จ๐ท Puerto Viejo | 49% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Canggu | 49% | ||
| 20 | ๐ต๐ท San Juan | 49% | ||
| 21 | ๐จ๐ด Cartagena | 49% | ||
| 22 | ๐บ๐ธ Miami | 48% | ||
| 23 | ๐ช๐ธ Marbella | 48% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Guadalajara | 48% | ||
| 25 | ๐ช๐ธ Fuerteventura | 48% | ||
| 26 | ๐ง๐ท Sรฃo Paulo | 48% | ||
| 27 | ๐ช๐ธ Mallorca | 48% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฆ๐ช Abu Dhabi | 48% | ||
| 29 | ๐ญ๐ท Dubrovnik | 48% | ||
| 30 | ๐ช๐ธ Lanzarote | 48% | Share of visiting nomads into gym & strength trainingn=148,461 nomads | |
๐๏ธ Least gym-going visitors | ||||
| # | City | Gym / strength | ||
| 1 | ๐ณ๐ฑ The Hague | 31% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฌ๐ง Glasgow | 33% | ||
| 3 | ๐น๐ท Izmir | 34% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Yogyakarta | 34% | ||
| 5 | ๐ง๐ฌ Plovdiv | 34% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Miguel de Allende | 35% | ||
| 7 | ๐บ๐ฟ Tashkent | 35% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฌ๐ง Belfast | 35% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Jaipur | 35% | ||
| 10 | ๐ณ๐ด Bergen | 35% | ||
| 11 | ๐ง๐พ Minsk | 35% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฆ๐ท Ushuaia | 35% | ||
| 13 | ๐ง๐ฆ Sarajevo | 36% | ||
| 14 | ๐ท๐ธ Novi Sad | 36% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Almaty | 36% | ||
| 16 | ๐ง๐ฆ Mostar | 36% | ||
| 17 | ๐ต๐ช Arequipa | 36% | ||
| 18 | ๐น๐ญ Chiang Rai | 36% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Yerevan | 36% | ||
| 20 | ๐จ๐ฑ San Pedro de Atacama | 37% | ||
| 21 | ๐จ๐ณ Chengdu | 37% | ||
| 22 | ๐ซ๐ท Lyon | 37% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Cristรณbal de las Casas | 37% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฌ๐ง Edinburgh | 37% | ||
| 25 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Fes | 37% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฆ๐ท Cordoba | 37% | ||
| 27 | ๐บ๐ธ Portland | 37% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฉ๐ช Dusseldorf | 37% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฒ๐ฉ Chisinau | 37% | ||
| 30 | ๐ฌ๐ง Liverpool | 38% | Share of visiting nomads into gym & strength trainingn=148,461 nomads | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who list beer, wine, cocktails or drinking among their likes (of those who shared any lifestyle likes).
๐บ Biggest drinkers | ||||
| # | City | Drinks | ||
| 1 | ๐ฆ๐ท Mendoza | 71% | ||
| 2 | ๐ป๐ณ Hue | 65% | ||
| 3 | ๐จ๐บ Havana | 65% | ||
| 4 | ๐บ๐พ Montevideo | 65% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฎ๐ช Dublin | 64% | ||
| 6 | ๐ญ๐ท Dubrovnik | 64% | ||
| 7 | ๐จ๐ด Santa Marta | 64% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฆ๐ท Cordoba | 64% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฎ๐น Florence | 64% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Isla Mujeres | 64% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฌ๐ง Manchester | 64% | ||
| 12 | ๐ต๐ญ Boracay | 64% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฆ๐ท Bariloche | 64% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cancun | 64% | ||
| 15 | ๐ต๐ท San Juan | 64% | ||
| 16 | ๐บ๐ธ Orlando | 63% | ||
| 17 | ๐ญ๐ท Split | 63% | ||
| 18 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Queenstown | 63% | ||
| 19 | ๐ช๐ธ Seville | 63% | ||
| 20 | ๐ป๐ฆ Vatican City | 63% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฎ๐ธ Reykjavik | 63% | ||
| 22 | ๐ช๐จ Quito | 63% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฉ๐ช Cologne | 63% | ||
| 24 | ๐บ๐ธ New Orleans | 63% | ||
| 25 | ๐ญ๐ท Zadar | 63% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฏ๐ต Sapporo | 63% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฌ๐ท Santorini | 63% | ||
| 28 | ๐ง๐ธ Nassau | 63% | ||
| 29 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Lanta | 63% | ||
| 30 | ๐ฌ๐น Antigua | 63% | Share of visiting nomads who like alcoholn=148,461 nomads | |
๐ฑ Most sober visitors | ||||
| # | City | Drinks | ||
| 1 | ๐จ๐ณ Shenzhen | 49% | ||
| 2 | ๐น๐ณ Tunis | 49% | ||
| 3 | ๐ต๐น Portimรฃo | 49% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฎ๐น Lake Como | 50% | ||
| 5 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Utrecht | 50% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฉ๐ช Stuttgart | 51% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฒ๐ฉ Chisinau | 51% | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐ณ Guangzhou | 51% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฆ๐ช Abu Dhabi | 52% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Jakarta | 52% | ||
| 11 | ๐ท๐บ Moscow | 52% | ||
| 12 | ๐ธ๐ป San Salvador | 52% | ||
| 13 | ๐ด๐ฒ Muscat | 52% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Bengaluru | 52% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Ubud | 52% | ||
| 16 | ๐ง๐พ Minsk | 52% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฒ๐ช Podgorica | 52% | ||
| 18 | ๐จ๐ณ Shanghai | 53% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Sanur | 53% | ||
| 20 | ๐จ๐ญ Geneva | 53% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฐ๐ท Seoul | 53% | ||
| 22 | ๐ต๐ญ Manila | 53% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฆ๐ช Dubai | 53% | ||
| 24 | ๐บ๐ธ Honolulu | 53% | ||
| 25 | ๐ท๐ด Timisoara | 53% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Uluwatu | 53% | ||
| 27 | ๐ต๐ญ Siargao | 53% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Taghazout | 53% | ||
| 29 | ๐ณ๐ต Pokhara | 53% | ||
| 30 | ๐น๐ญ Hua Hin | 53% | Share of visiting nomads who like alcoholn=148,461 nomads | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who list partying among their likes (of those who shared any lifestyle likes).
๐ Biggest partiers | ||||
| # | City | Parties | ||
| 1 | ๐ช๐ธ Ibiza | 28% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฌ๐ท Mykonos | 25% | ||
| 3 | ๐ญ๐ท Hvar | 25% | ||
| 4 | ๐ง๐ท Rio de Janeiro | 22% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Tangier | 21% | ||
| 6 | ๐ญ๐ท Split | 21% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฌ๐น Guatemala City | 21% | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐ด Santa Marta | 21% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Goa | 21% | ||
| 10 | ๐จ๐ด Cartagena | 21% | ||
| 11 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Phi Phi | 21% | ||
| 12 | ๐จ๐บ Havana | 21% | ||
| 13 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Pha Ngan | 21% | ||
| 14 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Tao | 21% | ||
| 15 | ๐น๐ญ Pattaya | 20% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Tulum | 20% | ||
| 17 | ๐จ๐ฆ Montreal | 20% | ||
| 18 | ๐จ๐ด Bogota | 20% | ||
| 19 | ๐ง๐ท Salvador | 20% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Seminyak | 20% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Playa del Carmen | 20% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Fes | 20% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Gili Air | 20% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฒ๐จ Monaco | 20% | ||
| 25 | ๐จ๐ด Medellรญn | 20% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cabo San Lucas | 20% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | 20% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Denpasar | 20% | ||
| 29 | ๐ซ๐ท Marseille | 20% | ||
| 30 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Mumbai | 20% | Share of visiting nomads who like partyingn=148,461 nomads | |
๐ด Quietest visitors | ||||
| # | City | Parties | ||
| 1 | ๐ธ๐ช Malmรถ | 10% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฉ๐ช Hamburg | 10% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Sanur | 10% | ||
| 4 | ๐ท๐ธ Novi Sad | 10% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฎ๐น Lake Como | 11% | ||
| 6 | ๐จ๐ณ Chengdu | 11% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฎ๐น Verona | 12% | ||
| 8 | ๐ง๐ช Antwerp | 12% | ||
| 9 | ๐ต๐ฑ Wrocลaw | 12% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Essaouira | 12% | ||
| 11 | ๐ง๐พ Minsk | 12% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Yerevan | 12% | ||
| 13 | ๐บ๐ฟ Tashkent | 12% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฐ๐ฌ Bishkek | 12% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Weligama | 12% | ||
| 16 | ๐บ๐ธ Dallas | 12% | ||
| 17 | ๐ธ๐ช Gothenburg | 12% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Miguel de Allende | 13% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฌ๐ช Tbilisi | 13% | ||
| 20 | ๐ต๐พ Asuncion | 13% | ||
| 21 | ๐ด๐ฒ Muscat | 13% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Bengaluru | 13% | ||
| 23 | ๐น๐ญ Chiang Rai | 13% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฎ๐ฑ Jerusalem | 13% | ||
| 25 | ๐ฌ๐ง Glasgow | 13% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฆ๐น Salzburg | 13% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฎ๐น Pisa | 13% | ||
| 28 | ๐ง๐ฌ Plovdiv | 13% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฒ๐ป Male | 13% | ||
| 30 | ๐ต๐ญ Siargao | 13% | Share of visiting nomads who like partyingn=148,461 nomads | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who say they’re single (of those who shared their relationship status).
๐ Most single visitors | ||||
| # | City | Single | ||
| 1 | ๐จ๐ด Medellรญn | 79% | ||
| 2 | ๐ต๐ญ Cebu | 76% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puerto Escondido | 75% | ||
| 4 | ๐ช๐จ Quito | 74% | ||
| 5 | ๐ง๐ท Rio de Janeiro | 74% | ||
| 6 | ๐ง๐ท Florianopolis | 74% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฐ๐ช Nairobi | 74% | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐ด Cartagena | 74% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฌ๐น Antigua | 74% | ||
| 10 | ๐ช๐ฌ Cairo | 73% | ||
| 11 | ๐จ๐ท San Josรฉ | 73% | ||
| 12 | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama City | 73% | ||
| 13 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bansko | 73% | ||
| 14 | ๐ช๐ธ Ibiza | 73% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฆ๐ท Buenos Aires | 73% | ||
| 16 | ๐ต๐ช Lima | 73% | ||
| 17 | ๐ต๐ญ Manila | 73% | ||
| 18 | ๐ต๐พ Asuncion | 73% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฏ๐ด Amman | 73% | ||
| 20 | ๐ต๐ช Cusco | 72% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | 72% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Canggu | 72% | ||
| 23 | ๐ช๐ธ Valencia | 72% | ||
| 24 | ๐ช๐ธ Gran Canaria | 72% | ||
| 25 | ๐น๐ผ Taipei | 72% | ||
| 26 | ๐ง๐ท Sรฃo Paulo | 72% | ||
| 27 | ๐ญ๐ท Zagreb | 72% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฆ๐ฑ Tirana | 72% | ||
| 29 | ๐จ๐ด Bogota | 72% | ||
| 30 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Playa del Carmen | 72% | Share of visiting nomads who are singlen=69,926 nomads | |
๐ Most coupled-up visitors | ||||
| # | City | Single | ||
| 1 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Phi Phi | 58% | ||
| 2 | ๐ป๐ฆ Vatican City | 59% | ||
| 3 | ๐จ๐พ Larnaca | 60% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฒ๐พ Penang | 60% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฆ๐น Salzburg | 60% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฉ๐ช Frankfurt | 60% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | 60% | ||
| 8 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Lanta | 61% | ||
| 9 | ๐บ๐ธ Seattle | 61% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฆ๐ช Abu Dhabi | 61% | ||
| 11 | ๐บ๐ธ Austin | 62% | ||
| 12 | ๐น๐ญ Krabi | 62% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐น Sliema | 62% | ||
| 14 | ๐ท๐บ Moscow | 62% | ||
| 15 | ๐ง๐ช Bruges | 62% | ||
| 16 | ๐น๐ท Antalya | 62% | ||
| 17 | ๐ณ๐ด Oslo | 62% | ||
| 18 | ๐ท๐บ Saint Petersburg | 62% | ||
| 19 | ๐จ๐บ Havana | 63% | ||
| 20 | ๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong | 63% | ||
| 21 | ๐บ๐ธ Las Vegas | 63% | ||
| 22 | ๐จ๐ฆ Vancouver | 63% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฎ๐น Milan | 63% | ||
| 24 | ๐ซ๐ท Paris | 64% | ||
| 25 | ๐บ๐ธ San Francisco | 64% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Siem Reap | 64% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฉ๐ช Cologne | 64% | ||
| 28 | ๐บ๐ธ Los Angeles | 64% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฉ๐ด Punta Cana | 64% | ||
| 30 | ๐บ๐ธ San Diego | 64% | Share of visiting nomads who are singlen=69,926 nomads | |
A blended 0-100 score of the visiting nomads to each city, combining how attractive they’re rated, their median income, and how many hold a graduate degree. Each city is percentile-ranked against the others on all three, then averaged with equal weight.
๐ Most attractive, rich & educated | ||||
| # | City | Score | ||
| 1 | ๐บ๐ธ Boston | 90% | ||
| 2 | ๐จ๐ญ Geneva | 86% | ||
| 3 | ๐จ๐ญ Zurich | 85% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ Cape Town | 82% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฎ๐ธ Reykjavik | 77% | ||
| 6 | ๐ง๐ท Florianopolis | 76% | ||
| 7 | ๐ธ๐ช Stockholm | 76% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฎ๐ฑ Tel Aviv | 75% | ||
| 9 | ๐ง๐ท Rio de Janeiro | 74% | ||
| 10 | ๐บ๐ธ New York City | 73% | ||
| 11 | ๐ช๐ธ Ibiza | 70% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฉ๐ฐ Copenhagen | 70% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Tulum | 70% | ||
| 14 | ๐ณ๐ด Oslo | 69% | ||
| 15 | ๐จ๐ฆ Montreal | 68% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Marrakesh | 67% | ||
| 17 | ๐ธ๐ฎ Ljubljana | 65% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฉ๐ช Munich | 65% | ||
| 19 | ๐ง๐ท Sรฃo Paulo | 65% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฎ๐น Palermo | 64% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฎ๐น Naples | 63% | ||
| 22 | ๐ช๐ธ Mallorca | 62% | ||
| 23 | ๐จ๐ด Cartagena | 62% | ||
| 24 | ๐ต๐น Madeira | 62% | ||
| 25 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puerto Escondido | 61% | ||
| 26 | ๐ต๐น Lisbon | 60% | ||
| 27 | ๐ซ๐ท Nice | 60% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฑ๐ป Riga | 60% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฎ๐ช Dublin | 60% | ||
| 30 | ๐ง๐ฆ Sarajevo | 59% | Blend of attractiveness, income & education of visiting nomadsn=46,507 nomads | |
๐๏ธ Least attractive, lowest income & least educated | ||||
| # | City | Score | ||
| 1 | ๐น๐ญ Pattaya | 2% | ||
| 2 | ๐ป๐ณ Da Nang | 6% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | 7% | ||
| 4 | ๐ต๐ญ Cebu | 10% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฒ๐พ Kuala Lumpur | 13% | ||
| 6 | ๐น๐ญ Phuket | 13% | ||
| 7 | ๐ป๐ณ Ho Chi Minh City | 15% | ||
| 8 | ๐ต๐ญ Manila | 15% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Jakarta | 16% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Phnom Penh | 16% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฆ๐ฑ Tirana | 18% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Seminyak | 19% | ||
| 13 | ๐ป๐ณ Hanoi | 20% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฏ๐ต Fukuoka | 21% | ||
| 15 | ๐น๐ญ Krabi | 21% | ||
| 16 | ๐น๐ญ Bangkok | 24% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Siem Reap | 24% | ||
| 18 | ๐บ๐พ Montevideo | 24% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฏ๐ต Osaka | 25% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฒ๐พ Penang | 26% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Almaty | 27% | ||
| 22 | ๐ท๐ธ Belgrade | 27% | ||
| 23 | ๐บ๐ธ Las Vegas | 28% | ||
| 24 | ๐น๐ผ Taipei | 28% | ||
| 25 | ๐ป๐ณ Hoi An | 30% | ||
| 26 | ๐ธ๐ฐ Bratislava | 31% | ||
| 27 | ๐ช๐จ Quito | 31% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฐ๐ท Busan | 31% | ||
| 29 | ๐ต๐พ Asuncion | 32% | ||
| 30 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | 32% | Blend of attractiveness, income & education of visiting nomadsn=46,507 nomads | |
Check out Nomads.com to find the best places to live and work remotely, and meet other people also traveling as a digital nomad.
~2 expected ๐ฅ
๐น
Paraguay Nomads Meetup #115 in Villa Morra, Asunciรณn
๐ต๐พ Asunciรณn · Thu Sep 10, 19:00
1 going ๐ฅ
๐
Beach bumming at Costa da Caparica
๐ต๐น Lisbon · Sun Sep 13, 15:00

2 going ๐ฅ
โ
Tuesday Coworking @ West Coffee
๐ต๐พ Asuncion · Tue Sep 15, 13:00

~4 expected ๐ฅ
โ
Tuesday Coworking @ West Coffee
๐ต๐พ Asuncion · Tue Sep 22, 13:00

~6 expected ๐ฅ
Can't login? See the FAQ










By signing up, you agree to our terms of service and community guidelines.
One-time-payment: $19.99
Billed once. Then never again. 7-day money back guarantee
โ Just $1 to avoid spammers
Nomads.com members
work remotely at









๐ Thanks for signing up! I hope you like my site. I put a lot of effort into making it for years!
๐ฌ First, please go to your email and click the confirm link first to verify your email address
โ๏ธ Check your spam folder if you can't find it, because we got reports it ends up there sometimes
๐ After you confirm your email we'll send you an email with more info
๐ฉโ๐ป You can start using Nomads.com's member-only features now!