If you already have an account, we'll log you in
๐ถ 37-year old
โ ๏ธ Non-progressive
๐ซ Not religious
๐ Single
โ๐ป White
๐ Heterosexual
๐จ โ Man
๐
with a
Bachelor's
๐ป
works as a
Software Dev
๐ก
from
a Home office
๐ฐ
makes
$85,000 / y
โ๏ธ
loves
Coffee
๐ฅฉ eats meat
๐ฅพ
works out by
Hiking
๐ฏ๐ต
loves
Tokyo most
๐
is vaccinated
๐
produces 72% less COโ
6๏ธโฃ
and stays for
6 months
๐ถ Nomads by age |
||||
| Age | % | |||
| 18 |
0.1%
|
|||
| 21 |
0.1%
|
|||
| 22 |
0.3%
|
|||
| 23 |
0.3%
|
|||
| 24 |
0.5%
|
|||
| 25 |
1%
|
|||
| 26 |
2%
|
|||
| 27 |
2%
|
|||
| 28 |
1%
|
|||
| 29 |
2%
|
|||
| 30 |
2%
|
|||
| 31 |
3%
|
|||
| 32 |
5%
|
|||
| 33 |
7%
|
|||
| 34 |
7%
|
|||
| 35 |
4%
|
|||
| 36 |
6%
|
|||
| 37 |
8%
|
|||
| 38 |
6%
|
|||
| 39 |
6%
|
|||
| 40 |
6%
|
|||
| 41 |
4%
|
|||
| 42 |
4%
|
|||
| 43 |
3%
|
|||
| 44 |
3%
|
active last 365d, n=1,033 | ||
โณ๏ธ Nomads by nationality |
||||
| # | Country | People | % | |
| 1 | ๐บ๐ธ United States | 56,158,551 | 41% | |
| 2 | ๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom | 9,249,925 | 7% | |
| 3 | ๐จ๐ฆ Canada | 6,179,351 | 5% | |
| 4 | ๐ท๐บ Russia | 5,926,255 | 4% | |
| 5 | ๐ฉ๐ช Germany | 5,773,443 | 4% | |
| 6 | ๐ซ๐ท France | 4,823,141 | 4% | |
| 7 | ๐ง๐ท Brazil | 3,696,150 | 3% | |
| 8 | ๐ฆ๐บ Australia | 3,185,183 | 2% | |
| 9 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands | 2,559,607 | 2% | |
| 10 | ๐ฎ๐ณ India | 2,526,180 | 2% | |
| 11 | ๐ช๐ธ Spain | 2,526,180 | 2% | |
| 12 | ๐ฎ๐น Italy | 2,058,192 | 2% | |
| 13 | ๐บ๐ฆ Ukraine | 1,981,786 | 1% | |
| 14 | ๐ต๐ฑ Poland | 1,685,712 | 1% | |
| 15 | ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland | 1,380,087 | 1% | |
| 16 | ๐น๐ท Turkey | 1,060,136 | 1% | |
| 17 | ๐ฆ๐น Austria | 1,031,484 | 1% | |
| 18 | ๐ฏ๐ต Japan | 969,404 | 1% | |
| 19 | ๐ธ๐ช Sweden | 950,302 | 1% | |
| 20 | ๐ฎ๐ช Ireland | 926,425 | 1% | |
| 21 | ๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel | 845,243 | 1% | |
| 22 | ๐ง๐ช Belgium | 830,917 | 1% | |
| 23 | ๐จ๐ฟ Czechia | 802,265 | 1% | |
| 24 | ๐ฐ๐ท South Korea | 792,714 | 1% | |
| 25 | ๐ฆ๐ท Argentina | 787,939 | 1% | |
| 26 | ๐ต๐น Portugal | 754,511 | 1% | |
| 27 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa | 725,859 | 1% | |
| 28 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico | 721,083 | 1% | |
| 29 | ๐ท๐ด Romania | 706,757 | 1% | |
| 30 | ๐จ๐ณ China | 692,431 | 1% | n=28,347 |
๐ถ Nomads by gender |
||||
| Gender | % | |||
| ๐จโ Men |
83%
|
|||
| ๐ฑโโ๏ธ Women |
17%
|
|||
| ๐ง Other |
0%
|
active last 365d, n=16,157 | ||
๐ Nomads by sexuality |
||||
| Sexuality | % | |||
| ๐ Heterosexual |
88%
|
|||
| ๐ฆ Bisexual |
7%
|
|||
| ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ Gay or lesbian |
5%
|
n=18,366 | ||
๐ Nomads by beliefs |
||||
| Religion | % | |||
| ๐ซ Not religious |
51%
|
|||
| ๐ Spirituality |
28%
|
|||
| โช๏ธ Christianity |
11%
|
|||
| ๐ Buddhism |
3%
|
|||
| ๐ Islam |
3%
|
|||
| โจ Astrology |
2%
|
|||
| ๐ Judaism |
2%
|
|||
| ๐ Hinduism |
2%
|
|||
| ๐ณ Sikhism |
0%
|
n=9,515 | ||
โ Nomads by ethnicity |
||||
| Ethnicity | % | |||
| โ๐ป White |
59%
|
|||
| โ๐พ Non-white |
41%
|
|||
| ↱โ๐ผ Asian |
14%
|
|||
| ↱โ๐ฝ Latin |
12%
|
|||
| ↱โ๐ฟ Black |
7%
|
|||
| ↱โ๐ฝ Indian |
5%
|
|||
| ↱โ๐พ Middle Eastern |
3%
|
|||
| ↱โ๐ฝ Pacific |
1%
|
n=8,659 | ||
๐ Education |
||||
| Education | % | |||
| ๐ High School |
9%
|
|||
| ๐ Higher education |
91%
|
|||
| ↱๐ Bachelor's |
53%
|
|||
| ↱๐ Master's |
35%
|
|||
| ↱๐ฉโ๐ซ PhD |
3%
|
n=20,189 | ||
โค๏ธ Nomads by relationship |
||||
| Relationship | % | |||
| ๐ Single |
67%
|
|||
| ๐ In a relationship |
33%
|
n=11,755 | ||
๐ Nomads looking for |
||||
| Looking for | % | |||
| ๐ค Friends |
36%
|
|||
| ๐ Travel buddies |
32%
|
|||
| ๐น Casual dating |
15%
|
|||
| โค๏ธ Relationship |
13%
|
|||
| ๐ Poly dating |
4%
|
n=68,080 | ||
๐ฐ Nomads by income |
||||
| Income | % | |||
| < $25k / y |
7%
|
|||
| $25k - $50k / y |
15%
|
|||
| $50k - $100k / y |
33%
|
|||
| $100k - $250k / y |
35%
|
|||
| > $250k - $1M / y |
9%
|
|||
| > $1M / y |
2%
|
|||
| Average | $125,702 / y | |||
| Median | $85,000 / y | n=5,954 | ||
๐ฐ Nomads by employment |
||||
| Employment type | % | |||
| Full time |
37%
|
|||
| Startup founder |
19%
|
|||
| Freelance |
19%
|
|||
| Full time contractor |
9%
|
|||
| Agency |
8%
|
|||
| Other |
6%
|
|||
| Part time |
2%
|
|||
| Part time contractor |
1%
|
n=7,775 | ||
๐ก Where do nomads work from |
||||
| Place | % | |||
| ๐ก Home office |
58%
|
|||
| ๐ฌ Coworking |
15%
|
|||
| โ๏ธ Cafe |
8%
|
|||
| ๐ข Office |
8%
|
|||
| ๐ Couch |
4%
|
|||
| ๐ฝ Dining table |
3%
|
|||
| ๐ Bed |
2%
|
|||
| ๐ช Balcony |
1%
|
|||
| ๐ Van |
1%
|
|||
| ๐ฅ Boat |
0%
|
|||
| ๐ช Kitchen |
0%
|
|||
| ๐ชด Garden |
0%
|
|||
| ๐ฆ Pool |
0%
|
|||
| ๐ Library |
0%
|
n=6,537 | ||
๐ฌ What messaging apps nomads use? |
||||
| Messaging app | % | |||
| Telegram |
50%
|
|||
|
43%
|
||||
| Snapchat |
3%
|
|||
|
2%
|
||||
|
0%
|
||||
| LINE |
0%
|
|||
| Slack |
0%
|
n=6,436 | ||
โ๏ธ Nomad men by politics |
||||
| Politics | % | |||
| ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ Progressive |
43%
|
|||
| โ๏ธ Non-progressive |
57%
|
|||
| ↱๐ฝ Libertarian |
27%
|
|||
| ↱โ๏ธ Centrist |
22%
|
|||
| ↱๐ด Conservative |
8%
|
n=3,976 | ||
โ๏ธ Nomad women by politics |
||||
| Politics | % | |||
| ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ Progressive |
72%
|
|||
| โ๏ธ Non-progressive |
28%
|
|||
| ↱๐ฝ Libertarian |
13%
|
|||
| ↱โ๏ธ Centrist |
12%
|
|||
| ↱๐ด Conservative |
3%
|
n=899 | ||
๐ฅฉ 77% of ๐จโ men eat meat
๐ฅฉ 57% of ๐ฑโโ๏ธwomen eat meat
๐ซ 37% of nomads don't eat meat
๐ฅ 11% are vegetarian
๐ฅ 11% are vegan
๐ 5% are pescetarian
๐ Nomad men by diet |
||||
| Diet | % | |||
| ๐ฅฉ Eats meat |
77%
|
|||
| ๐ซ Does not eat meat |
23%
|
|||
| ↱๐ฅ Vegetarian |
10%
|
|||
| ↱๐ฅ Vegan |
10%
|
|||
| ↱๐ Pescetarian |
4%
|
n=6,139 | ||
๐ Nomad women by diet |
||||
| Diet | % | |||
| ๐ฅฉ Eats meat |
57%
|
|||
| ๐ซ Does not eat meat |
43%
|
|||
| ↱๐ฅ Vegetarian |
19%
|
|||
| ↱๐ฅ Vegan |
15%
|
|||
| ↱๐ Pescetarian |
10%
|
n=1,293 | ||
๐ฅพ Hiking
๐ช Fitness
๐ Running
๐คธโโ๏ธ Yoga
๐ Swimming
๐ด Cycling
๐ Nomad men by sports |
||||
| Sport | % | |||
| ๐ช Fitness |
49%
|
|||
| ๐ฅพ Hiking |
47%
|
|||
| ๐ Running |
28%
|
|||
| ๐ด Cycling |
24%
|
|||
| ๐ Swimming |
23%
|
|||
| ๐คธโโ๏ธ Yoga |
20%
|
|||
| ๐ Surfing |
17%
|
|||
| โท Skiing |
15%
|
|||
| ๐ Diving |
15%
|
|||
| ๐ Snowboarding |
15%
|
|||
| โฐ Climbing |
15%
|
|||
| ๐พ Tennis |
14%
|
|||
| ๐ Motorcycling |
13%
|
|||
| ๐ช Fight sports |
10%
|
|||
| ๐ Table tennis |
9%
|
n=11,972 | ||
๐ Nomad women by sports |
||||
| Sport | % | |||
| ๐ฅพ Hiking |
51%
|
|||
| ๐คธโโ๏ธ Yoga |
45%
|
|||
| ๐ช Fitness |
40%
|
|||
| ๐ Swimming |
25%
|
|||
| ๐ Running |
21%
|
|||
| ๐ด Cycling |
17%
|
|||
| ๐ Diving |
15%
|
|||
| ๐ Surfing |
14%
|
|||
| โฐ Climbing |
13%
|
|||
| โท Skiing |
12%
|
|||
| ๐พ Tennis |
11%
|
|||
| ๐ Snowboarding |
9%
|
|||
| ๐ช Crossfit |
5%
|
|||
| ๐ Motorcycling |
5%
|
|||
| ๐ Volleyball |
5%
|
n=2,730 | ||
๐ฏ๐ต Tokyo
๐ต๐น Ericeira
๐บ๐ธ Chicago
๐ต๐น Portimรฃo
๐ง๐ฌ Varna
๐ฎ๐ธ Reykjavik
๐ Most liked cities by men |
||||
| # | City | Rating | ||
| 1 | ๐ฒ๐พ Kuala Lumpur | 4.55 | ||
| 2 | ๐ฏ๐ต Tokyo | 4.44 | ||
| 3 | ๐น๐ญ Chiang Mai | 4.29 | ||
| 4 | ๐ฏ๐ต Osaka | 4.29 | ||
| 5 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | 4.29 | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | 4.17 | ||
| 7 | ๐จ๐ฟ Prague | 4.17 | ||
| 8 | ๐น๐ญ Bangkok | 4.12 | ||
| 9 | ๐ต๐ฑ Krakรณw | 4.00 | ||
| 10 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Ubud | 4.00 | ||
| 11 | ๐บ๐ธ New York City | 4.00 | ||
| 12 | ๐ฏ๐ต Fukuoka | 4.00 | ||
| 13 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Siem Reap | 4.00 | ||
| 14 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bansko | 4.00 | ||
| 15 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Amsterdam | 4.00 | n=6,781 | |
๐ Most liked cities by women |
||||
| # | City | Rating | ||
| 1 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | 4.00 | ||
| 2 | ๐จ๐ด Medellรญn | 3.75 | ||
| 3 | ๐น๐ญ Bangkok | 3.33 | ||
| 4 | ๐น๐ญ Chiang Mai | 3.33 | ||
| 5 | ๐ต๐น Azores | 3.33 | ||
| 6 | ๐ช๐ธ Valencia | 3.33 | ||
| 7 | ๐ป๐ณ Da Nang | 3.33 | ||
| 8 | ๐ฌ๐น Antigua | 3.33 | ||
| 9 | ๐ฆ๐บ Sydney | 3.33 | ||
| 10 | ๐ฌ๐ช Tbilisi | 3.33 | ||
| 11 | ๐ฆ๐ท Buenos Aires | 3.33 | ||
| 12 | ๐ณ๐ฑ The Hague | 3.33 | ||
| 13 | ๐ธ๐ช Stockholm | 3.33 | ||
| 14 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bansko | 3.33 | ||
| 15 | ๐ป๐ณ Hue | 3.33 | n=6,781 | |
๐ Most visited cities |
||||
| # | City | % visited | ||
| 1 | ๐น๐ญ Bangkok | 2.18% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฌ๐ง London | 2.16% | ||
| 3 | ๐ช๐ธ Barcelona | 1.46% | ||
| 4 | ๐ซ๐ท Paris | 1.46% | ||
| 5 | ๐บ๐ธ New York City | 1.43% | ||
| 6 | ๐ต๐น Lisbon | 1.43% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฉ๐ช Berlin | 1.4% | ||
| 8 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Amsterdam | 1.16% | ||
| 9 | ๐บ๐ธ San Francisco | 1.1% | ||
| 10 | ๐น๐ญ Chiang Mai | 1.04% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | 0.95% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฏ๐ต Tokyo | 0.93% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Canggu | 0.88% | ||
| 14 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | 0.88% | ||
| 15 | ๐น๐ท Istanbul | 0.85% | ||
| 16 | ๐ช๐ธ Madrid | 0.82% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฒ๐พ Kuala Lumpur | 0.8% | ||
| 18 | ๐บ๐ธ Los Angeles | 0.79% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฆ๐ช Dubai | 0.77% | ||
| 20 | ๐ญ๐บ Budapest | 0.77% | ||
| 21 | ๐จ๐ฟ Prague | 0.71% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฆ๐ท Buenos Aires | 0.69% | ||
| 23 | ๐จ๐ด Medellรญn | 0.6% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฎ๐น Rome | 0.59% | ||
| 25 | ๐ฆ๐น Vienna | 0.58% | ||
| 26 | ๐ท๐บ Moscow | 0.57% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฐ๐ท Seoul | 0.55% | ||
| 28 | ๐ป๐ณ Ho Chi Minh City | 0.54% | ||
| 29 | ๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong | 0.53% | ||
| 30 | ๐น๐ญ Phuket | 0.51% | n=448,117 | |
๐ Most visited countries |
||||
| # | Country | % visited | ||
| 1 | ๐บ๐ธ United States | 13% | ||
| 2 | ๐ช๐ธ Spain | 5% | ||
| 3 | ๐น๐ญ Thailand | 5% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฉ๐ช Germany | 4% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom | 4% | ||
| 6 | ๐ซ๐ท France | 3% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico | 3% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฎ๐น Italy | 3% | ||
| 9 | ๐ต๐น Portugal | 3% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia | 2% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฏ๐ต Japan | 2% | ||
| 12 | ๐ง๐ท Brazil | 2% | ||
| 13 | ๐จ๐ฆ Canada | 2% | ||
| 14 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands | 2% | ||
| 15 | ๐ป๐ณ Vietnam | 2% | ||
| 16 | ๐น๐ท Turkey | 2% | ||
| 17 | ๐ท๐บ Russia | 1% | ||
| 18 | ๐ต๐ฑ Poland | 1% | ||
| 19 | ๐จ๐ด Colombia | 1% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฆ๐บ Australia | 1% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia | 1% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฎ๐ณ India | 1% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฌ๐ท Greece | 1% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฆ๐ท Argentina | 1% | ||
| 25 | ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland | 1% | ||
| 26 | ๐จ๐ณ China | 1% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฆ๐น Austria | 1% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฆ๐ช United Arab Emirates | 1% | ||
| 29 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | 1% | ||
| 30 | ๐ญ๐บ Hungary | 1% | n=448,117 | |
๐ Avg. COโ by member traveling |
||||
| Year | COโ | |||
| 2013 |
670 kg/y
|
|||
| 2014 |
986 kg/y
|
|||
| 2015 |
1,075 kg/y
|
|||
| 2016 |
1,287 kg/y
|
|||
| 2017 |
1,465 kg/y
|
|||
| 2018 |
1,537 kg/y
|
|||
| 2019 |
1,569 kg/y
|
|||
| 2020 |
991 kg/y
|
|||
| 2021 |
1,003 kg/y
|
|||
| 2022 |
1,574 kg/y
|
|||
| 2023 |
1,719 kg/y
|
|||
| 2024 |
1,698 kg/y
|
|||
| 2025 |
1,609 kg/y
|
|||
| 2026 |
1,516 kg/y
|
|||
| Average | 1,310 kg/y | |||
| Median | 1,376 kg/y |
Based on 448,117 trips by 16,584 members @ 115g/km COโ emitted. An average American spends ~5,000kg/y on commuting by car and flying. We'd assume nomads travel more internationally but on the other hand they don't commute to work since they work 100% remotely. Many walk to work or work from their home, hotel or Airbnb. That means on average nomads generate 1,376 kg/y, or 72% less COโ than the average American on travel and commuting. |
||
๐จ Where men go most |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. ๐ฑโโ๏ธ | ||
| 1 | ๐น๐ญ Bangkok | +23% | ||
| 2 | ๐ต๐น Lisbon | -16% | ||
| 3 | ๐ช๐ธ Barcelona | -11% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฌ๐ง London | -22% | ||
| 5 | ๐น๐ญ Chiang Mai | -2% | ||
| 6 | ๐ซ๐ท Paris | -24% | ||
| 7 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Amsterdam | +1% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฉ๐ช Berlin | -4% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Canggu | +1% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฏ๐ต Tokyo | +16% | ||
| 11 | ๐น๐ท Istanbul | +7% | ||
| 12 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | +10% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐พ Kuala Lumpur | +28% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | -21% | ||
| 15 | ๐ญ๐บ Budapest | +14% | median temp=18°C; n=448,117 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Where women go most |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. ๐จ | ||
| 1 | ๐ต๐น Lisbon | +20% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฌ๐ง London | +27% | ||
| 3 | ๐น๐ญ Bangkok | -19% | ||
| 4 | ๐ช๐ธ Barcelona | +13% | ||
| 5 | ๐ซ๐ท Paris | +32% | ||
| 6 | ๐น๐ญ Chiang Mai | +2% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | +27% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฉ๐ช Berlin | +4% | ||
| 9 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Amsterdam | -1% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Canggu | -1% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฎ๐น Rome | +27% | ||
| 12 | ๐น๐ท Istanbul | -6% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Ubud | +31% | ||
| 14 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | -9% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฏ๐ต Tokyo | -13% | median temp=18°C; n=448,117 | |
๐จ Where men go more |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. women | ||
| 1 | ๐ท๐บ Russia | +79% | ||
| 2 | ๐ต๐ฑ Poland | +62% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฌ๐ช Georgia | +51% | ||
| 4 | ๐ท๐ด Romania | +49% | ||
| 5 | ๐ต๐ญ Philippines | +36% | ||
| 6 | ๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong | +29% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฆ๐ช United Arab Emirates | +28% | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐ณ China | +27% | ||
| 9 | ๐ท๐ธ Serbia | +27% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฏ๐ต Japan | +21% | ||
| 11 | ๐จ๐ฟ Czechia | +19% | ||
| 12 | ๐ป๐ณ Vietnam | +19% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia | +18% | ||
| 14 | ๐ณ๐ด Norway | +18% | ||
| 15 | ๐น๐ญ Thailand | +14% | median temp=18°C; n=448,117 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Where women go more |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. men | ||
| 1 | ๐จ๐ท Costa Rica | +53% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa | +49% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico | +40% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom | +30% | ||
| 5 | ๐ญ๐ท Croatia | +29% | ||
| 6 | ๐ซ๐ท France | +24% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฎ๐น Italy | +21% | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐ฑ Chile | +18% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฌ๐ท Greece | +14% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฆ๐บ Australia | +13% | ||
| 11 | ๐ต๐น Portugal | +13% | ||
| 12 | ๐ต๐ช Peru | +11% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฎ๐ช Ireland | +10% | ||
| 14 | ๐ช๐ธ Spain | +9% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฆ๐ท Argentina | +7% | median temp=18°C; n=448,117 | |
๐ Most liked countries |
||||
| # | Country | Rating | ||
| 1 | ๐ฏ๐ต Japan | 4.85 | ||
| 2 | ๐ญ๐บ Hungary | 4.65 | ||
| 3 | ๐จ๐ฟ Czechia | 4.55 | ||
| 4 | ๐ญ๐ท Croatia | 4.55 | ||
| 5 | ๐ฑ๐ป Latvia | 4.5 | ||
| 6 | ๐ต๐ฑ Poland | 4.45 | ||
| 7 | ๐ฐ๐ท South Korea | 4.4 | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland | 4.4 | ||
| 9 | ๐ฌ๐ท Greece | 4.3 | ||
| 10 | ๐ฌ๐น Guatemala | 4.3 | ||
| 11 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Kazakhstan | 4.3 | ||
| 12 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa | 4.25 | ||
| 13 | ๐ฑ๐น Lithuania | 4.25 | ||
| 14 | ๐ช๐ช Estonia | 4.25 | ||
| 15 | ๐ท๐บ Russia | 4.25 | n=4,013 | |
๐คฎ Least liked countries |
||||
| # | Country | Rating | ||
| 1 | ๐จ๐บ Cuba | 1 | ||
| 2 | ๐ฎ๐ท Iran | 1.65 | ||
| 3 | ๐ฌ๐ฎ Gibraltar | 1.65 | ||
| 4 | ๐ญ๐ณ Honduras | 1.65 | ||
| 5 | ๐จ๐พ Cyprus | 1.65 | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐ฉ Moldova | 2 | ||
| 7 | ๐ฒ๐น Malta | 2.15 | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐ฑ Chile | 2.25 | ||
| 9 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Sri Lanka | 2.35 | ||
| 10 | ๐ธ๐ด Somalia | 2.5 | ||
| 11 | ๐ช๐น Ethiopia | 2.5 | ||
| 12 | ๐น๐ฟ Tanzania | 2.5 | ||
| 13 | ๐ธ๐ณ Senegal | 2.5 | ||
| 14 | ๐ฑ๐บ Luxembourg | 2.5 | ||
| 15 | ๐ณ๐ฎ Nicaragua | 2.5 | n=4,013 | |
โฐ How long do nomads stay in one city? |
||||
| Duration | % | |||
| < 7 days |
48%
|
|||
| 7 - 30 days |
32%
|
|||
| 30 - 90 days |
14%
|
|||
| 90+ days |
6%
|
|||
| Average | 62 days (2 months) | |||
| Median | 7 days | n=436,972 | ||
๐ก How long do nomads stay in one country? |
||||
| Duration | % | |||
| < 7 days |
0%
|
|||
| 7 - 30 days |
59%
|
|||
| 30 - 90 days |
28%
|
|||
| 90+ days |
14%
|
|||
| Average | 174 days (6 months) | n=436,972 | ||
๐ป Software Dev
๐ Startup Founder
๐ธ Web Dev
๐ Marketing
๐ฉโ๐จ Creative
๐ SaaS
๐จ Nomad men work as |
||||
| # | Work | % | vs. women | |
| 1 | ๐ป Software Dev | 31% | +275% | |
| 2 | ๐ Startup Founder | 24% | +127% | |
| 3 | ๐ธ Web Dev | 24% | +274% | |
| 4 | ๐ Marketing | 13% | -13% | |
| 5 | ๐ SaaS | 12% | +176% | |
| 6 | ๐ฉโ๐จ Creative | 10% | -30% | |
| 7 | ๐ฑ Mobile Dev | 10% | +334% | |
| 8 | ๐ค Product Manager | 9% | +52% | |
| 9 | ๐จ UI/UX Design | 9% | +19% | |
| 10 | ๐ Data | 9% | +76% | |
| 11 | ๐ฐ Crypto | 9% | +251% | |
| 12 | ๐ฐ Finance | 8% | +106% | |
| 13 | ๐ Ecommerce | 7% | +80% | |
| 14 | ๐ค Sales | 7% | +62% | |
| 15 | ๐ Dev Ops | 5% | +427% | n=27,613 |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Nomad women work as |
||||
| # | Work | % | vs. men | |
| 1 | ๐ Marketing | 15% | +15% | |
| 2 | ๐ฉโ๐จ Creative | 15% | +43% | |
| 3 | ๐ Startup Founder | 11% | -56% | |
| 4 | ๐ป Software Dev | 8% | -73% | |
| 5 | ๐จ UI/UX Design | 8% | -16% | |
| 6 | ๐ค Community | 8% | +52% | |
| 7 | ๐จโ๐ซ Education | 7% | +40% | |
| 8 | ๐ Blogging | 7% | +45% | |
| 9 | ๐ Coach | 7% | +48% | |
| 10 | ๐ธ Web Dev | 6% | -73% | |
| 11 | ๐ค Product Manager | 6% | -34% | |
| 12 | ๐ Data | 5% | -43% | |
| 13 | ๐ SaaS | 4% | -64% | |
| 14 | ๐ฐ Finance | 4% | -51% | |
| 15 | ๐ Ecommerce | 4% | -45% | n=6,933 |
๐จ Nomad men vs. women |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. women | ||
| 1 | ๐ Dev Ops | +427% | ||
| 2 | ๐ก Sysadmin | +399% | ||
| 3 | ๐ Engineering | +359% | ||
| 4 | ๐ Investor | +355% | ||
| 5 | ๐ช Military | +352% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฑ Mobile Dev | +334% | ||
| 7 | ๐พ Game Dev | +304% | ||
| 8 | ๐ค AI | +303% | ||
| 9 | ๐ป Software Dev | +275% | ||
| 10 | ๐ธ Web Dev | +274% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฐ Crypto | +251% | ||
| 12 | ๐ก๏ธ InfoSec | +237% | ||
| 13 | ๐ค AI model | +231% | ||
| 14 | ๐จ Stay-at-home dad | +214% | ||
| 15 | ๐ SaaS | +176% | n=34,445 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Nomad women vs. men |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. men | ||
| 1 | ๐ธ House wife | +232% | ||
| 2 | ๐งโ๐ผ Human resources | +100% | ||
| 3 | ๐ Tradwife | +99% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฐ Journalism | +84% | ||
| 5 | ๐ง Psychologist | +83% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฅ Healthcare | +67% | ||
| 7 | ๐ Hospitality | +65% | ||
| 8 | ๐ Support | +64% | ||
| 9 | ๐จโโ๏ธ Medical | +55% | ||
| 10 | ๐ค Community | +52% | ||
| 11 | ๐ Coach | +48% | ||
| 12 | ๐ Blogging | +45% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฉโ๐จ Creative | +43% | ||
| 14 | ๐จโ๐ซ Education | +40% | ||
| 15 | ๐ Recruitment | +36% | n=34,445 | |
โ๏ธ Coffee
๐ฌ๐ง Speaks English
๐ Optimist
โฐ Outdoors
๐ Single
๐ช Fitness
๐จโ Nomad men |
||||
| # | Tag | % | vs. ๐ฑโโ๏ธ | |
| 1 | โ๏ธ Coffee | 32% | +12% | |
| 2 | ๐ฌ๐ง Speaks English | 28% | +8% | |
| 3 | ๐ Optimist | 27% | +15% | |
| 4 | ๐ช Fitness | 22% | +32% | |
| 5 | ๐ Single | 22% | +18% | |
| 6 | ๐ง Open-minded | 21% | +9% | |
| 7 | โฐ Outdoors | 21% | -8% | |
| 8 | ๐ฅพ Hiking | 21% | +1% | |
| 9 | ๐ COVID vaccinated | 21% | +7% | |
| 10 | ๐ถ Dogs | 20% | -7% | |
| 11 | โ๏ธ Waking up early | 20% | +11% | |
| 12 | ๐บ Beer | 19% | +103% | |
| 13 | ๐ Staying up late | 19% | +38% | |
| 14 | ๐ Reading | 19% | -7% | |
| 15 | ๐ญ No smoking | 18% | +9% | n=27,613 |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Nomad women |
||||
| # | Tag | % | vs. ๐จโ | |
| 1 | โ๏ธ Coffee | 29% | -11% | |
| 2 | ๐ฌ๐ง Speaks English | 26% | -7% | |
| 3 | ๐ Optimist | 23% | -13% | |
| 4 | โฐ Outdoors | 23% | +8% | |
| 5 | ๐ถ Dogs | 22% | +7% | |
| 6 | ๐ฅพ Hiking | 21% | -1% | |
| 7 | ๐ท Wine | 21% | +15% | |
| 8 | ๐ Reading | 20% | +7% | |
| 9 | ๐ COVID vaccinated | 20% | -7% | |
| 10 | ๐ง Open-minded | 19% | -9% | |
| 11 | ๐ต Tea | 19% | +16% | |
| 12 | ๐คธโโ๏ธ Yoga | 19% | +109% | |
| 13 | ๐ Single | 19% | -15% | |
| 14 | โ๏ธ Waking up early | 18% | -10% | |
| 15 | ๐ญ No smoking | 17% | -9% | n=6,933 |
๐จ Nomad men vs. women |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. ๐ฑโโ๏ธ | ||
| 1 | ๐จ No beard | +509% | ||
| 2 | โฝ๏ธ Football | +359% | ||
| 3 | ๐งโ Short hair | +326% | ||
| 4 | ๐ช Dropout | +254% | ||
| 5 | โ๏ธ Private pilot | +239% | ||
| 6 | ๐ Basketball | +223% | ||
| 7 | ๐ Ice hockey | +223% | ||
| 8 | โ๏ธ Chess | +193% | ||
| 9 | ๐ Hindu | +191% | ||
| 10 | ๐ Race sports | +189% | ||
| 11 | ๐ Table tennis | +180% | ||
| 12 | ๐ Motorcycling | +177% | ||
| 13 | ๐ด Conservative politics | +171% | ||
| 14 | ๐ช Fight sports | +168% | ||
| 15 | ๐ Creatine | +159% | n=34,445 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Nomad women vs. men |
||||
| # | Tag | vs. ๐จ | ||
| 1 | ๐ Makeup | +4,215% | ||
| 2 | ๐คธโโ๏ธ Pilates | +879% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฑโโ๏ธ Long hair | +401% | ||
| 4 | ๐ถ Ceramics | +371% | ||
| 5 | ๐ Dress up | +294% | ||
| 6 | โจ Astrology | +281% | ||
| 7 | ๐ช Feminism | +259% | ||
| 8 | โฑ๏ธ Luxury brands | +226% | ||
| 9 | โจ Believe in astrology | +184% | ||
| 10 | ๐ Fashion | +179% | ||
| 11 | ๐ถ Pottery | +173% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฅ Red hair | +159% | ||
| 13 | ๐จ Drawing | +144% | ||
| 14 | ๐ Dancing | +127% | ||
| 15 | ๐ Shopping | +124% | n=34,445 | |
๐ Nomads by vaccination |
||||
| Vaccinated | % | |||
| ๐ COVID vaccinated |
92%
|
|||
| ๐ Not COVID vaccinated |
8%
|
n=8,558 | ||
๐ Vaccination (men) | ||||
| Vaccinated | % | |||
| ๐ Vaccinated | 91% | |||
| ๐ Not vaccinated | 9% | n=6,291 | ||
๐ Vaccination (women) | ||||
| Vaccinated | % | |||
| ๐ Vaccinated | 93% | |||
| ๐ Not vaccinated | 7% | n=1,456 | ||
โค๏ธ Nomads by family |
||||
| Relationship | % | |||
| โค๏ธ Close to parents |
82%
|
|||
| ๐ Not close to parents |
18%
|
n=2,719 | ||
๐ถ Nomads by childhood |
||||
| Childhood | % | |||
| ๐ Happy childhood |
89%
|
|||
| ๐ Unhappy childhood |
11%
|
n=2,933 | ||
๐จ Childhood (men) | ||||
| Childhood | % | |||
| ๐ Happy childhood | 90% | |||
| ๐ Unhappy childhood | 10% | n=2,247 | ||
๐ฉ Childhood (women) | ||||
| Childhood | % | |||
| ๐ Happy childhood | 87% | |||
| ๐ Unhappy childhood | 13% | n=421 | ||
๐ก Homeownership amongst nomads |
||||
| Homeownership | % | |||
| ๐ก Homeowner |
56%
|
|||
| ๐ก Not a homeowner |
44%
|
n=3,172 | ||
Attractiveness is based on the proportion of people liking or disliking a person based on their photo on Nomads.com's dating app. It does not show any of these traits in their profile when they rate them. People who are rated as attractive based on their photo are more likely to have these traits. TL;DR hot people have specific traits, but those specific traits don't necessarily make you hot (you could always try though).
๐ In a relationship
๐ My parents separated
๐ Volleyball
๐ง Only child
๐ Pickleball
๐จโ Most attractive men's traits |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | ๐ Pickleball | +246% | ||
| 2 | ๐งฌ Longevity | +192% | ||
| 3 | ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ LGBTQ+ | +189% | ||
| 4 | ๐ Creatine | +179% | ||
| 5 | ๐ In a relationship | +143% | ||
| 6 | ๐ข Slowmad | +131% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฆ Sparkling water | +124% | ||
| 8 | ๐๏ธ Live in the mountains | +96% | ||
| 9 | ๐ Basketball | +85% | ||
| 10 | ๐ธ Padel | +85% | ||
| 11 | โจ Believe in astrology | +82% | ||
| 12 | ๐ก Architecture | +80% | ||
| 13 | ๐ก Homeowner | +79% | ||
| 14 | ๐ง Bouldering | +78% | ||
| 15 | ๐ค Podcast | +76% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฌ ๐ | +72% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฒ Board games | +71% | ||
| 18 | ๐งโ Short hair | +70% | ||
| 19 | ๐ง Hiphop music | +69% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฅ Soft boiled eggs | +68% | ||
| 21 | ๐ง Dubstep music | +65% | ||
| 22 | ๐ Free diving | +65% | ||
| 23 | ๐๏ธ Live near the beach | +62% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฏ๐ฒ Reggae music | +62% | ||
| 25 | โณ๏ธ Golf | +59% | ||
| 26 | ๐ Skateboarding | +59% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฌ LINE | +59% | ||
| 28 | ๐ก Not a homeowner | +58% | ||
| 29 | ๐ถ Parent | +58% | ||
| 30 | ๐๏ธโ Weightlifting | +58% | n=34,445 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Most attractive women's traits |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | ๐ฉ Samoyeds | +229% | ||
| 2 | ๐ง Only child | +225% | ||
| 3 | ๐ My parents separated | +223% | ||
| 4 | ๐ Volleyball | +207% | ||
| 5 | ๐พ Tennis | +201% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฌ Social smoker | +193% | ||
| 7 | ๐ Shopping | +182% | ||
| 8 | ๐ Table tennis | +176% | ||
| 9 | ๐ Running | +172% | ||
| 10 | ๐ง Trance music | +170% | ||
| 11 | ๐งผ Clean freak | +165% | ||
| 12 | ๐ In a relationship | +164% | ||
| 13 | ๐ Surfing | +160% | ||
| 14 | ๐จโ๐ค Partying | +154% | ||
| 15 | โท Skiing | +147% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฝ Libertarian politics | +140% | ||
| 17 | โฌ๏ธ Has no tattoos | +126% | ||
| 18 | ๐ด Cycling | +124% | ||
| 19 | ๐ Pescetarian | +120% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฅ Vegan | +118% | ||
| 21 | ๐ Backpacking | +116% | ||
| 22 | ๐ซ Not religious | +114% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฅ Hard boiled eggs | +114% | ||
| 24 | ๐ Staying up late | +113% | ||
| 25 | ๐ Motorcycling | +112% | ||
| 26 | ๐บ Beer | +112% | ||
| 27 | ๐ 420 | +112% | ||
| 28 | ๐ Vanlife | +112% | ||
| 29 | ๐จ๐ณ Chinese food | +111% | ||
| 30 | ๐ช Fitness | +105% | n=34,445 | |
Attractiveness is based on the proportion of people liking or disliking a person based on their photo on Nomads.com's dating app. That does NOT mean people like or dislike specific traits. It's that people who are rated as unattractive are more likely to have selected these traits on their profile. TL;DR unattractive people have specific traits, but those specific traits don't necessarily make you unattractive.
๐ FetLife
๐ Makeup
โฑ๏ธ Luxury brands
๐ช Skydiving
๐ Bodyboarding
๐ถโ๐ซ๏ธ Hang gliding
๐จโ Most unattractive men's traits |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | ๐ FetLife | -2,932% | ||
| 2 | ๐ Makeup | -550% | ||
| 3 | โฑ๏ธ Luxury brands | -297% | ||
| 4 | ๐ช Skydiving | -159% | ||
| 5 | ๐ Bodyboarding | -95% | ||
| 6 | ๐ถโ๐ซ๏ธ Hang gliding | -80% | ||
| 7 | ๐ญ Swinging | -77% | ||
| 8 | ๐ Cricket | -71% | ||
| 9 | ๐ง Garage music | -64% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฐ๐ท K-pop music | -52% | ||
| 11 | ๐ณ Bowling | -40% | ||
| 12 | ๐ Religious | -31% | ||
| 13 | ๐ง Trance music | -29% | ||
| 14 | โ๏ธ Private pilot | -26% | ||
| 15 | ๐ Single | -17% | ||
| 16 | ๐ Motorcycling | -17% | ||
| 17 | ๐ Kink | -16% | ||
| 18 | ๐ Paleo | -15% | ||
| 19 | ๐จโ๐ฆฒ Bald | -13% | ||
| 20 | ๐ป Gardening | -12% | ||
| 21 | ๐ Sex positive | -12% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฉ Samoyeds | -9% | ||
| 23 | ๐ Shopping | -8% | ||
| 24 | ๐ Race sports | -8% | ||
| 25 | ๐ Buddhist | -7% | ||
| 26 | ๐ Urbex | -5% | ||
| 27 | ๐ช Paragliding | -3% | ||
| 28 | โ๏ธ Doesn't want kids | -1% | n=34,445 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Most unattractive women's traits |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | ๐ฅ Messy | -2,165% | ||
| 2 | ๐ธ Anime | -1,383% | ||
| 3 | ๐๏ธ Live near the beach | -1,221% | ||
| 4 | ๐ข Slowmad | -1,221% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฆ Still water | -1,113% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฌ Daily smoker | -1,059% | ||
| 7 | ๐ง Pessimist | -978% | ||
| 8 | ๐ง Bouldering | -924% | ||
| 9 | ๐งฌ Longevity | -871% | ||
| 10 | ๐ด Conservative politics | -682% | ||
| 11 | ๐ค Podcast | -682% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฆ Sparkling water | -655% | ||
| 13 | ๐ Fashion | -655% | ||
| 14 | ๐ Nails | -547% | ||
| 15 | ๐ Vintage | -466% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฌ TikTok | -439% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฌ Snapchat | -412% | ||
| 18 | ๐ Creatine | -385% | ||
| 19 | ๐ต๐ท Reggaeton music | -385% | ||
| 20 | ๐ High heels | -277% | ||
| 21 | ๐๏ธ Live in the mountains | -277% | ||
| 22 | ๐ FetLife | -250% | ||
| 23 | ๐งถ Knitting | -250% | ||
| 24 | ๐ถ Pottery | -250% | ||
| 25 | ๐ Pickleball | -197% | ||
| 26 | ๐ Jewelry | -170% | ||
| 27 | โฑ๏ธ Luxury brands | -143% | ||
| 28 | โจ Believe in astrology | -130% | ||
| 29 | โค๏ธ Happy childhood | -95% | ||
| 30 | ๐ Basketball | -91% | n=34,445 | |
Attractiveness is based on the proportion of people liking or disliking a person based on their photo on Nomads.com's dating app. That does NOT mean people like or dislike specific jobs. It's that people who are rated as attractive are more likely to work in speciifc industries. TL;DR hot people work in specific industries, but those specific industries don't necessarily make you hot (you could always try though).
๐ฑ Mobile Dev
๐ Recruitment
๐ค Community
๐ Coach
๐ SaaS
๐จ UI/UX Design
๐จโ Attractive men's jobs |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | ๐ค AI model | +114% | ||
| 2 | ๐น Content Creator | +111% | ||
| 3 | ๐จ Artist | +103% | ||
| 4 | ๐ค Consulting | +102% | ||
| 5 | ๐ Engineering | +76% | ||
| 6 | ๐จโโ๏ธ Medical | +73% | ||
| 7 | ๐ธ Model | +67% | ||
| 8 | ๐ SaaS | +64% | ||
| 9 | ๐จ UI/UX Design | +62% | ||
| 10 | ๐ง Psychologist | +60% | ||
| 11 | ๐ Recruitment | +57% | ||
| 12 | ๐ Investor | +53% | ||
| 13 | ๐ Logistics | +51% | ||
| 14 | ๐ Coach | +50% | ||
| 15 | ๐ค Product Manager | +48% | ||
| 16 | ๐ Ecommerce | +43% | ||
| 17 | ๐ VR Dev | +42% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฑ Mobile Dev | +37% | ||
| 19 | ๐ Marketing | +35% | ||
| 20 | ๐ Startup Founder | +35% | ||
| 21 | ๐ค Sales | +34% | ||
| 22 | ๐ Data | +33% | ||
| 23 | ๐ช Fitness | +32% | ||
| 24 | ๐ป Software Dev | +31% | ||
| 25 | ๐พ Game Dev | +29% | ||
| 26 | ๐งโ๐ผ Human resources | +28% | ||
| 27 | ๐ Dev Ops | +26% | ||
| 28 | ๐ธ Web Dev | +22% | ||
| 29 | ๐ Blogging | +20% | ||
| 30 | ๐ค Community | +19% | n=34,445 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Attractive women's jobs |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | ๐ฑ Mobile Dev | +161% | ||
| 2 | ๐ Recruitment | +128% | ||
| 3 | ๐ค Community | +107% | ||
| 4 | ๐ป Software Dev | +85% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฉโ๐จ Creative | +78% | ||
| 6 | ๐ช Fitness | +78% | ||
| 7 | ๐ Coach | +70% | ||
| 8 | ๐ Startup Founder | +67% | ||
| 9 | ๐จโ๐ซ Education | +64% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฐ Journalism | +59% | ||
| 11 | ๐ Blogging | +57% | ||
| 12 | ๐จ UI/UX Design | +57% | ||
| 13 | ๐ SaaS | +55% | ||
| 14 | ๐ค Product Manager | +54% | ||
| 15 | ๐ธ Web Dev | +48% | ||
| 16 | ๐ Marketing | +41% | ||
| 17 | ๐ Ecommerce | +37% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฐ Finance | +8% | n=34,445 | |
Attractiveness is based on the proportion of people liking or disliking a person based on their photo on Nomads.com's dating app. That does NOT mean people like or dislike specific jobs. It's that people who are rated as unattractive are more likely to have selected these jobs on their profile. TL;DR unattractive people have specific jobs, but those specific jobs don't necessarily make you unattractive.
๐ฉ Politics
๐ Real estate
๐ก๏ธ InfoSec
๐ฉโ๐ผ Law
๐ก Architecture
๐ฐ Journalism
๐จโ Most unattractive men's jobs |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | ๐ฉ Politics | -119% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฉโ๐ผ Law | -67% | ||
| 3 | ๐ก Architecture | -52% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฐ Journalism | -49% | ||
| 5 | ๐ก๏ธ InfoSec | -13% | ||
| 6 | ๐ Real estate | -10% | ||
| 7 | ๐ Support | -9% | ||
| 8 | ๐ถ Adult | -9% | ||
| 9 | ๐บ Geo | -5% | n=34,445 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Most unattractive women's jobs |
||||
| # | Tag | Diff | ||
| 1 | ๐น Content Creator | -1,679% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฉ Politics | -1,356% | ||
| 3 | ๐จ Artist | -924% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฅ Healthcare | -682% | ||
| 5 | ๐ VR Dev | -655% | ||
| 6 | ๐ Investor | -412% | ||
| 7 | ๐ต Music | -412% | ||
| 8 | ๐ค AI model | -385% | ||
| 9 | ๐ Real estate | -358% | ||
| 10 | ๐ก๏ธ InfoSec | -224% | ||
| 11 | ๐ Hospitality | -157% | ||
| 12 | ๐ Support | -36% | ||
| 13 | ๐ Sports | -32% | ||
| 14 | ๐ Data | -31% | ||
| 15 | ๐ค Sales | -23% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฉโ๐ผ Law | -20% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฐ Crypto | -14% | ||
| 18 | ๐บ Geo | -5% | ||
| 19 | ๐พ Game Dev | -2% | n=34,445 | |
๐จโ Where attractive men travel to |
||||
| # | City | Attractiveness | ||
| 1 | ๐ฌ๐ท Mykonos | 5 | ||
| 2 | ๐ต๐น Ericeira | 4.67 | ||
| 3 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Utrecht | 4.67 | ||
| 4 | ๐ธ๐ช Malmรถ | 4.67 | ||
| 5 | ๐ช๐ธ Ibiza | 4.65 | ||
| 6 | ๐ต๐น Portimรฃo | 4.57 | ||
| 7 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Uluwatu | 4.56 | ||
| 8 | ๐ฆ๐น Salzburg | 4.56 | ||
| 9 | ๐ช๐ธ Fuerteventura | 4.55 | ||
| 10 | ๐จ๐ท Tamarindo | 4.55 | ||
| 11 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cabo San Lucas | 4.54 | ||
| 12 | ๐ณ๐ด Bergen | 4.49 | ||
| 13 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Christchurch | 4.47 | ||
| 14 | ๐ญ๐ท Zadar | 4.46 | ||
| 15 | ๐ฆ๐บ Brisbane | 4.43 | ||
| 16 | ๐ช๐ธ Mallorca | 4.42 | ||
| 17 | ๐ง๐ฆ Sarajevo | 4.42 | ||
| 18 | ๐ฎ๐น Catania | 4.39 | ||
| 19 | ๐บ๐ธ Honolulu | 4.37 | ||
| 20 | ๐ฎ๐ธ Reykjavik | 4.37 | ||
| 21 | ๐ณ๐ด Oslo | 4.37 | ||
| 22 | ๐ช๐ธ Tenerife | 4.37 | ||
| 23 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Marrakesh | 4.37 | ||
| 24 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Lanta | 4.36 | ||
| 25 | ๐ฆ๐บ Melbourne | 4.35 | ||
| 26 | ๐จ๐ญ Zurich | 4.35 | ||
| 27 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Queenstown | 4.35 | ||
| 28 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Auckland | 4.34 | ||
| 29 | ๐ฌ๐ท Santorini | 4.34 | ||
| 30 | ๐ฒ๐ป Male | 4.34 | Based on attractiveness of visitors n=448,117 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Where attractive women travel to |
||||
| # | City | Attractiveness | ||
| 1 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Phi Phi | 5 | ||
| 2 | ๐ต๐ฑ Gdansk | 4.9 | ||
| 3 | ๐บ๐ธ Orlando | 4.89 | ||
| 4 | ๐ต๐ฑ Wrocลaw | 4.82 | ||
| 5 | ๐ฎ๐น Genoa | 4.77 | ||
| 6 | ๐ญ๐ท Zadar | 4.74 | ||
| 7 | ๐ป๐ณ Nha Trang | 4.7 | ||
| 8 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Galle | 4.66 | ||
| 9 | ๐ฉ๐ช Dresden | 4.65 | ||
| 10 | ๐จ๐ฑ Valparaรญso | 4.62 | ||
| 11 | ๐ท๐บ Moscow | 4.6 | ||
| 12 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Samui | 4.59 | ||
| 13 | ๐ป๐ณ Da Lat | 4.59 | ||
| 14 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Pha Ngan | 4.59 | ||
| 15 | ๐ฉ๐ด Punta Cana | 4.59 | ||
| 16 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Utrecht | 4.58 | ||
| 17 | ๐ง๐ช Ghent | 4.58 | ||
| 18 | ๐บ๐ฆ Kyiv | 4.58 | ||
| 19 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Uluwatu | 4.57 | ||
| 20 | ๐ฎ๐ฑ Tel Aviv | 4.57 | ||
| 21 | ๐ช๐ธ Fuerteventura | 4.57 | ||
| 22 | ๐ฆ๐บ Cairns | 4.55 | ||
| 23 | ๐ฌ๐ท Mykonos | 4.55 | ||
| 24 | ๐ฒ๐ช Budva | 4.55 | ||
| 25 | ๐ฌ๐ท Rhodes | 4.54 | ||
| 26 | ๐ท๐บ Saint Petersburg | 4.54 | ||
| 27 | ๐ฌ๐ช Batumi | 4.54 | ||
| 28 | ๐ฎ๐น Amalfi | 4.54 | ||
| 29 | ๐บ๐ธ Chicago | 4.53 | ||
| 30 | ๐ณ๐ด Oslo | 4.53 | Based on attractiveness of visitors n=448,117 | |
๐จโ Where unattractive men travel to |
||||
| # | City | Attractiveness | ||
| 1 | ๐น๐ญ Pattaya | 3.36 | ||
| 2 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Goa | 3.5 | ||
| 3 | ๐ป๐ณ Phu Quoc | 3.5 | ||
| 4 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Bengaluru | 3.53 | ||
| 5 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cozumel | 3.54 | ||
| 6 | ๐ฆ๐ท Cordoba | 3.55 | ||
| 7 | ๐ฑ๐ฆ Vientiane | 3.58 | ||
| 8 | ๐ฒ๐ช Podgorica | 3.58 | ||
| 9 | ๐บ๐ธ Houston | 3.59 | ||
| 10 | ๐ฒ๐ฉ Chisinau | 3.59 | ||
| 11 | ๐ด๐ฒ Muscat | 3.6 | ||
| 12 | ๐ฌ๐ง Belfast | 3.61 | ||
| 13 | ๐ณ๐ต Kathmandu | 3.61 | ||
| 14 | ๐ต๐พ Asuncion | 3.62 | ||
| 15 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Almaty | 3.62 | ||
| 16 | ๐ช๐ธ Alicante | 3.65 | ||
| 17 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Kuta | 3.65 | ||
| 18 | ๐ฌ๐ช Batumi | 3.67 | ||
| 19 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Phnom Penh | 3.67 | ||
| 20 | ๐บ๐ธ Seattle | 3.67 | ||
| 21 | ๐ฏ๐ต Hiroshima | 3.67 | ||
| 22 | ๐ช๐ฌ Cairo | 3.68 | ||
| 23 | ๐ฎ๐น Turin | 3.69 | ||
| 24 | ๐ฎ๐ฑ Jerusalem | 3.7 | ||
| 25 | ๐ฉ๐ช Dusseldorf | 3.7 | ||
| 26 | ๐ฏ๐ต Fukuoka | 3.71 | ||
| 27 | ๐ป๐ณ Nha Trang | 3.73 | ||
| 28 | ๐บ๐ฆ Lviv | 3.74 | ||
| 29 | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama City | 3.75 | ||
| 30 | ๐ช๐ธ Bilbao | 3.76 | Based on unattractiveness of visitors n=448,117 | |
๐ฑโโ๏ธ Where unattractive women travel to |
||||
| # | City | Attractiveness | ||
| 1 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Wellington | 3.21 | ||
| 2 | ๐ช๐จ Quito | 3.3 | ||
| 3 | ๐ฐ๐ช Nairobi | 3.32 | ||
| 4 | ๐จ๐ณ Macau | 3.35 | ||
| 5 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Weligama | 3.38 | ||
| 6 | ๐ฏ๐ต Hiroshima | 3.38 | ||
| 7 | ๐ฆ๐บ Perth | 3.38 | ||
| 8 | ๐ต๐ท San Juan | 3.42 | ||
| 9 | ๐ช๐จ Cuenca | 3.43 | ||
| 10 | ๐จ๐ด Santa Marta | 3.44 | ||
| 11 | ๐ฏ๐ด Amman | 3.51 | ||
| 12 | ๐ต๐พ Asuncion | 3.53 | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Guadalajara | 3.54 | ||
| 14 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Queenstown | 3.55 | ||
| 15 | ๐ฉ๐ด Santo Domingo | 3.55 | ||
| 16 | ๐จ๐ฆ Quebec City | 3.57 | ||
| 17 | ๐ฏ๐ฒ Montego Bay | 3.57 | ||
| 18 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Merida | 3.58 | ||
| 19 | ๐จ๐ด Bogota | 3.58 | ||
| 20 | ๐จ๐ณ Shenzhen | 3.61 | ||
| 21 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | 3.61 | ||
| 22 | ๐ฒ๐ป Male | 3.67 | ||
| 23 | ๐ฑ๐ฆ Vientiane | 3.67 | ||
| 24 | ๐ฏ๐ต Fukuoka | 3.67 | ||
| 25 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cozumel | 3.68 | ||
| 26 | ๐ง๐ฆ Sarajevo | 3.68 | ||
| 27 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Phnom Penh | 3.69 | ||
| 28 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Essaouira | 3.69 | ||
| 29 | ๐ฌ๐ง Glasgow | 3.69 | ||
| 30 | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama City | 3.69 | Based on unattractiveness of visitors n=448,117 | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city (locals excluded) who hold a ๐ graduate degree (a Master's or PhD), based on the highest degree they selected on their profile. Adjusted for sample size so cities with few visitors don't dominate.
๐ Where the most educated people travel to |
||||
| # | City | Graduate degree | ||
| 1 | ๐จ๐พ Larnaca | 46% | ||
| 2 | ๐ง๐พ Minsk | 46% | ||
| 3 | ๐ต๐น Madeira | 45% | ||
| 4 | ๐บ๐ธ Boston | 45% | ||
| 5 | ๐ท๐ด Brasov | 44% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐ฉ Chisinau | 44% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฉ๐ช Dresden | 43% | ||
| 8 | ๐บ๐ธ Seattle | 43% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Taghazout | 43% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฌ๐ช Batumi | 43% | ||
| 11 | ๐ณ๐ฑ The Hague | 43% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฑ๐ง Beirut | 43% | ||
| 13 | ๐ช๐ธ Fuerteventura | 43% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฆ๐ฉ Andorra la Vella | 43% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฑ๐บ Luxembourg | 43% | ||
| 16 | ๐จ๐ญ Geneva | 43% | ||
| 17 | ๐ต๐ฑ Wrocลaw | 43% | ||
| 18 | ๐ต๐ฑ Gdansk | 43% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฌ๐ท Thessaloniki | 42% | ||
| 20 | ๐จ๐พ Limassol | 42% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฑ๐ป Riga | 42% | ||
| 22 | ๐จ๐ฆ Montreal | 42% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฉ๐ด Santo Domingo | 42% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Yerevan | 42% | ||
| 25 | ๐ช๐ช Tallinn | 42% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฐ๐ฌ Bishkek | 42% | ||
| 27 | ๐ธ๐ฎ Ljubljana | 42% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Weligama | 42% | ||
| 29 | ๐ต๐น Azores | 42% | ||
| 30 | ๐ช๐ธ Gran Canaria | 42% | Share of visiting nomads with a graduate degree n=127,242 nomads | |
๐ Where the least educated people travel to |
||||
| # | City | Graduate degree | ||
| 1 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cabo San Lucas | 26% | ||
| 2 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Phi Phi | 26% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Tangier | 28% | ||
| 4 | ๐น๐ญ Krabi | 28% | ||
| 5 | ๐จ๐ท Tamarindo | 28% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Sayulita | 29% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Guadalajara | 29% | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐ณ Guangzhou | 30% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Jakarta | 30% | ||
| 10 | ๐น๐ญ Pattaya | 30% | ||
| 11 | ๐น๐ญ Ao Nang | 31% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Seminyak | 31% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Miguel de Allende | 31% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฏ๐ต Osaka | 31% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฏ๐ต Hiroshima | 31% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฌ๐ท Mykonos | 31% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฌ๐น Antigua | 32% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฆ๐บ Brisbane | 32% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | 32% | ||
| 20 | ๐จ๐ท Santa Teresa | 32% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฆ๐บ Perth | 32% | ||
| 22 | ๐ป๐ณ Hue | 32% | ||
| 23 | ๐จ๐ณ Chengdu | 32% | ||
| 24 | ๐น๐ผ Taipei | 32% | ||
| 25 | ๐น๐ญ Pai | 32% | ||
| 26 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Utrecht | 32% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฑ๐ฆ Vientiane | 32% | ||
| 28 | ๐ป๐ณ Hanoi | 32% | ||
| 29 | ๐ป๐ณ Da Nang | 32% | ||
| 30 | ๐จ๐ณ Macau | 32% | Share of visiting nomads with a graduate degree n=127,242 nomads | |
Median age of the visiting nomads who travel to each city (people who live there are excluded), based on the birth date on their profile.
๐ฃ Youngest visiting nomads | ||||
| # | City | Median age | ||
| 1 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Almaty | 33 yrs | ||
| 2 | ๐บ๐ธ Asheville | 33 yrs | ||
| 3 | ๐บ๐ฟ Tashkent | 33 yrs | ||
| 4 | ๐ฎ๐น Pisa | 33 yrs | ||
| 5 | ๐น๐ท Ankara | 33 yrs | ||
| 6 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Uluwatu | 34 yrs | ||
| 7 | ๐ต๐ฑ Warsaw | 34 yrs | ||
| 8 | ๐ต๐ญ Siargao | 34 yrs | ||
| 9 | ๐จ๐ณ Guangzhou | 34 yrs | ||
| 10 | ๐จ๐ณ Chengdu | 34 yrs | ||
| 11 | ๐บ๐ธ Austin | 34 yrs | ||
| 12 | ๐ฌ๐ช Batumi | 34 yrs | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Taghazout | 34 yrs | ||
| 14 | ๐น๐ท Antalya | 34 yrs | ||
| 15 | ๐บ๐ธ Minneapolis | 34 yrs | ||
| 16 | ๐ฐ๐ฌ Bishkek | 34 yrs | ||
| 17 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Yerevan | 34 yrs | ||
| 18 | ๐ฒ๐ช Podgorica | 34 yrs | ||
| 19 | ๐จ๐ฟ Brno | 34 yrs | ||
| 20 | ๐ฌ๐ช Kutaisi | 34 yrs | ||
| 21 | ๐ฎ๐น Milan | 34 yrs | ||
| 22 | ๐ถ๐ฆ Doha | 34 yrs | ||
| 23 | ๐ฌ๐ง Oxford | 34 yrs | ||
| 24 | ๐ฆ๐ท Bariloche | 34 yrs | ||
| 25 | ๐ธ๐ช Gothenburg | 34 yrs | ||
| 26 | ๐บ๐ธ Detroit | 34 yrs | ||
| 27 | ๐ธ๐ฆ Riyadh | 34 yrs | ||
| 28 | ๐บ๐ธ Charlotte | 34 yrs | ||
| 29 | ๐บ๐ธ Phoenix | 34 yrs | ||
| 30 | ๐ฌ๐ง Cambridge | 34 yrs | Median age of visiting nomads (locals excluded)n=205,404 nomads | |
๐ง Oldest visiting nomads | ||||
| # | City | Median age | ||
| 1 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Miguel de Allende | 41 yrs | ||
| 2 | ๐ง๐ท Recife | 40 yrs | ||
| 3 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puebla | 39 yrs | ||
| 4 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Hyderabad | 39 yrs | ||
| 5 | ๐ช๐จ Cuenca | 38.5 yrs | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puerto Vallarta | 38 yrs | ||
| 7 | ๐ฒ๐ฒ Yangon | 38 yrs | ||
| 8 | ๐น๐ญ Hua Hin | 38 yrs | ||
| 9 | ๐บ๐ธ St. Louis | 38 yrs | ||
| 10 | ๐จ๐ท Puerto Viejo | 38 yrs | ||
| 11 | ๐ฎ๐ช Galway | 38 yrs | ||
| 12 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Merida | 38 yrs | ||
| 13 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Wellington | 38 yrs | ||
| 14 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Lanta | 38 yrs | ||
| 15 | ๐ง๐ท Fortaleza | 38 yrs | ||
| 16 | ๐จ๐ฑ Valparaรญso | 37.5 yrs | ||
| 17 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cozumel | 37.5 yrs | ||
| 18 | ๐บ๐ธ Tampa | 37.5 yrs | ||
| 19 | ๐บ๐ฆ Odessa | 37 yrs | ||
| 20 | ๐ฑ๐ง Beirut | 37 yrs | ||
| 21 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Sayulita | 37 yrs | ||
| 22 | ๐ฌ๐ง Belfast | 37 yrs | ||
| 23 | ๐ง๐ธ Nassau | 37 yrs | ||
| 24 | ๐ฆ๐ฉ Andorra la Vella | 37 yrs | ||
| 25 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Isla Mujeres | 37 yrs | ||
| 26 | ๐ฌ๐ง Brighton | 37 yrs | ||
| 27 | ๐จ๐ฆ Quebec City | 37 yrs | ||
| 28 | ๐ฆ๐บ Cairns | 37 yrs | ||
| 29 | ๐ต๐ฆ Bocas del Toro | 37 yrs | ||
| 30 | ๐ซ๐ท Montpellier | 37 yrs | Median age of visiting nomads (locals excluded)n=205,404 nomads | |
Median self-reported yearly income of the visiting nomads who travel to each city (locals excluded). The median is used so a few very large numbers can’t skew it.
๐ฐ Highest-earning visitors | ||||
| # | City | Median income | ||
| 1 | ๐บ๐ธ Austin | $150,000 | ||
| 2 | ๐จ๐ฆ Vancouver | $150,000 | ||
| 3 | ๐ฌ๐ง London | $100,000 | ||
| 4 | ๐ฏ๐ต Tokyo | $100,000 | ||
| 5 | ๐ต๐น Madeira | $100,000 | ||
| 6 | ๐บ๐ธ New York City | $100,000 | ||
| 7 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | $100,000 | ||
| 8 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Auckland | $100,000 | ||
| 9 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ Cape Town | $100,000 | ||
| 10 | ๐ธ๐ฎ Ljubljana | $100,000 | ||
| 11 | ๐ฉ๐ช Munich | $100,000 | ||
| 12 | ๐ฉ๐ฐ Copenhagen | $100,000 | ||
| 13 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Mumbai | $100,000 | ||
| 14 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Marrakesh | $100,000 | ||
| 15 | ๐ง๐ท Sรฃo Paulo | $100,000 | ||
| 16 | ๐ง๐ท Rio de Janeiro | $100,000 | ||
| 17 | ๐น๐ผ Taipei | $100,000 | ||
| 18 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Oaxaca | $100,000 | ||
| 19 | ๐ฌ๐น Antigua | $100,000 | ||
| 20 | ๐บ๐ธ Boston | $100,000 | ||
| 21 | ๐ฆ๐บ Sydney | $100,000 | ||
| 22 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Delhi | $100,000 | ||
| 23 | ๐บ๐ธ Chicago | $100,000 | ||
| 24 | ๐จ๐ณ Beijing | $100,000 | ||
| 25 | ๐บ๐ธ Las Vegas | $100,000 | ||
| 26 | ๐ฆ๐ท Buenos Aires | $100,000 | ||
| 27 | ๐จ๐ด Bogota | $100,000 | ||
| 28 | ๐บ๐ธ Miami | $100,000 | ||
| 29 | ๐ธ๐ช Stockholm | $100,000 | ||
| 30 | ๐จ๐ฆ Montreal | $100,000 | Median self-reported income of visiting nomadsn=48,128 nomads | |
๐ช Lowest-earning visitors | ||||
| # | City | Median income | ||
| 1 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Almaty | $70,000 | ||
| 2 | ๐ต๐ญ Cebu | $70,000 | ||
| 3 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Yerevan | $70,000 | ||
| 4 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Phnom Penh | $70,000 | ||
| 5 | ๐น๐ญ Pattaya | $75,000 | ||
| 6 | ๐น๐ท Antalya | $75,000 | ||
| 7 | ๐ฌ๐ช Batumi | $75,000 | ||
| 8 | ๐ฒ๐พ Penang | $75,000 | ||
| 9 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Pha Ngan | $75,000 | ||
| 10 | ๐ป๐ณ Hoi An | $75,000 | ||
| 11 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bansko | $75,000 | ||
| 12 | ๐ฌ๐ช Tbilisi | $75,000 | ||
| 13 | ๐ฐ๐ท Busan | $75,000 | ||
| 14 | ๐ป๐ณ Da Nang | $75,000 | ||
| 15 | ๐ป๐ฆ Vatican City | $80,000 | ||
| 16 | ๐ฑ๐บ Luxembourg | $80,000 | ||
| 17 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | $80,000 | ||
| 18 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Lanta | $80,000 | ||
| 19 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Tao | $80,000 | ||
| 20 | ๐น๐ญ Phuket | $80,000 | ||
| 21 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Jakarta | $80,000 | ||
| 22 | ๐ฒ๐ฐ Skopje | $80,000 | ||
| 23 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Siem Reap | $80,000 | ||
| 24 | ๐ฏ๐ต Fukuoka | $80,000 | ||
| 25 | ๐ป๐ณ Hanoi | $80,000 | ||
| 26 | ๐น๐ญ Krabi | $80,000 | ||
| 27 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Ubud | $80,000 | ||
| 28 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Uluwatu | $80,000 | ||
| 29 | ๐ฒ๐พ Kuala Lumpur | $80,000 | ||
| 30 | ๐น๐ญ Chiang Mai | $80,000 | Median self-reported income of visiting nomadsn=48,128 nomads | |
Among the nomads who travel to each city, the chance that two random visitors come from different countries — higher means a more internationally mixed crowd of visitors.
๐ Most international crowd | ||||
| # | City | Nationality mix | ||
| 1 | ๐บ๐ธ Denver | 96% | ||
| 2 | ๐บ๐ธ San Francisco | 96% | ||
| 3 | ๐บ๐ธ New York City | 96% | ||
| 4 | ๐บ๐ธ Houston | 96% | ||
| 5 | ๐บ๐ธ Boston | 95% | ||
| 6 | ๐บ๐ธ Washington | 95% | ||
| 7 | ๐บ๐ธ Los Angeles | 95% | ||
| 8 | ๐บ๐ธ Las Vegas | 95% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฒ๐พ Langkawi | 95% | ||
| 10 | ๐บ๐ธ Miami | 95% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Weligama | 95% | ||
| 12 | ๐บ๐ธ Chicago | 95% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Galle | 95% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฌ๐ช Kutaisi | 95% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | 95% | ||
| 16 | ๐จ๐ฟ Brno | 95% | ||
| 17 | ๐บ๐ธ San Diego | 94% | ||
| 18 | ๐ช๐ธ Tenerife | 94% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Gili Trawangan | 94% | ||
| 20 | ๐บ๐ธ Seattle | 94% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Uluwatu | 94% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฆ๐ช Abu Dhabi | 94% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Denpasar | 94% | ||
| 24 | ๐น๐ญ Hua Hin | 94% | ||
| 25 | ๐ง๐ฌ Varna | 94% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฌ๐ท Rhodes | 94% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฆ๐ช Dubai | 94% | ||
| 28 | ๐บ๐ธ New Orleans | 94% | ||
| 29 | ๐ช๐ฌ Dahab | 94% | ||
| 30 | ๐บ๐ธ Atlanta | 94% | How mixed the visiting nomads’ nationalities aren=169,807 nomads | |
๐ Least international crowd | ||||
| # | City | Nationality mix | ||
| 1 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cabo San Lucas | 40% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Miguel de Allende | 46% | ||
| 3 | ๐ต๐ท San Juan | 46% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Sayulita | 55% | ||
| 5 | ๐ช๐จ Cuenca | 55% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puerto Vallarta | 58% | ||
| 7 | ๐ง๐ธ Nassau | 63% | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐ท Tamarindo | 65% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cozumel | 67% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Guadalajara | 69% | ||
| 11 | ๐จ๐ท Santa Teresa | 70% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฌ๐น Antigua | 71% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | 72% | ||
| 14 | ๐ช๐จ Quito | 72% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฌ๐น Guatemala City | 72% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Merida | 73% | ||
| 17 | ๐จ๐ด Medellรญn | 74% | ||
| 18 | ๐จ๐ฆ Vancouver | 75% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฎ๐น Amalfi | 75% | ||
| 20 | ๐ณ๐ฎ San Juan del Sur | 75% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Tulum | 76% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Oaxaca | 76% | ||
| 23 | ๐จ๐ท San Josรฉ | 76% | ||
| 24 | ๐จ๐ฆ Quebec City | 76% | ||
| 25 | ๐ต๐ฆ Bocas del Toro | 76% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฎ๐ธ Reykjavik | 77% | ||
| 27 | ๐จ๐ฆ Calgary | 77% | ||
| 28 | ๐ธ๐ป San Salvador | 77% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puebla | 77% | ||
| 30 | ๐จ๐ด Cartagena | 78% | How mixed the visiting nomads’ nationalities aren=169,807 nomads | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who work as software, web or mobile developers (of those who shared their profession).
๐จโ๐ป Most developer-heavy visitors | ||||
| # | City | Developers | ||
| 1 | ๐ฌ๐ช Batumi | 67% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Almaty | 67% | ||
| 3 | ๐จ๐พ Larnaca | 63% | ||
| 4 | ๐บ๐ฟ Tashkent | 63% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฐ๐ฌ Bishkek | 63% | ||
| 6 | ๐ท๐ด Cluj | 62% | ||
| 7 | ๐ง๐พ Minsk | 62% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Yerevan | 62% | ||
| 9 | ๐ป๐ณ Da Lat | 61% | ||
| 10 | ๐น๐ท Antalya | 61% | ||
| 11 | ๐ต๐ฑ Wrocลaw | 61% | ||
| 12 | ๐ซ๐ท Lyon | 61% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Denpasar | 61% | ||
| 14 | ๐น๐ผ Kaohsiung | 60% | ||
| 15 | ๐ท๐ธ Novi Sad | 60% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Bengaluru | 60% | ||
| 17 | ๐น๐ญ Pattaya | 60% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฏ๐ต Osaka | 60% | ||
| 19 | ๐บ๐ธ San Francisco | 60% | ||
| 20 | ๐ท๐บ Moscow | 60% | ||
| 21 | ๐บ๐ธ Orlando | 60% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฏ๐ต Hiroshima | 59% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฒ๐พ Langkawi | 59% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฏ๐ต Fukuoka | 59% | ||
| 25 | ๐ต๐ฑ Krakรณw | 59% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฌ๐ช Tbilisi | 59% | ||
| 27 | ๐ป๐ณ Phu Quoc | 59% | ||
| 28 | ๐ท๐ธ Belgrade | 59% | ||
| 29 | ๐ณ๐ด Oslo | 58% | ||
| 30 | ๐ฒ๐ช Budva | 58% | Share of visiting nomads who are developersn=157,423 nomads | |
๐ด Fewest developers | ||||
| # | City | Developers | ||
| 1 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cabo San Lucas | 36% | ||
| 2 | ๐ช๐จ Cuenca | 39% | ||
| 3 | ๐ง๐ท Salvador | 39% | ||
| 4 | ๐ณ๐ฎ San Juan del Sur | 39% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Tulum | 41% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puerto Vallarta | 42% | ||
| 7 | ๐จ๐ด Santa Marta | 42% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Sayulita | 42% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฌ๐น Antigua | 42% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ Cape Town | 43% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Miguel de Allende | 43% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฉ๐ด Santo Domingo | 43% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Oaxaca | 43% | ||
| 14 | ๐ช๐ธ San Sebastian | 43% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Merida | 44% | ||
| 16 | ๐จ๐ท Santa Teresa | 44% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฑ๐ง Beirut | 44% | ||
| 18 | ๐ต๐ฆ Bocas del Toro | 44% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฉ๐ด Punta Cana | 44% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฆ๐บ Perth | 44% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฐ๐ช Nairobi | 45% | ||
| 22 | ๐ช๐จ Quito | 45% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Isla Mujeres | 45% | ||
| 24 | ๐จ๐บ Havana | 45% | ||
| 25 | ๐ฌ๐ท Mykonos | 45% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฆ๐ท El Calafate | 45% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฏ๐ด Amman | 45% | ||
| 28 | ๐ต๐น Lagos | 46% | ||
| 29 | ๐จ๐ท Puerto Viejo | 46% | ||
| 30 | ๐ต๐ญ Siargao | 46% | Share of visiting nomads who are developersn=157,423 nomads | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who are startup founders (of those who shared their profession).
๐ Most founder-heavy visitors | ||||
| # | City | Founders | ||
| 1 | ๐ฎ๐น Lake Como | 47% | ||
| 2 | ๐บ๐ธ San Francisco | 47% | ||
| 3 | ๐ช๐ธ Marbella | 47% | ||
| 4 | ๐จ๐ณ Shenzhen | 46% | ||
| 5 | ๐บ๐ธ Boston | 45% | ||
| 6 | ๐บ๐ธ Dallas | 44% | ||
| 7 | ๐บ๐ธ New Orleans | 44% | ||
| 8 | ๐ด๐ฒ Muscat | 42% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฆ๐บ Perth | 41% | ||
| 10 | ๐บ๐ธ Las Vegas | 41% | ||
| 11 | ๐บ๐ฆ Kyiv | 41% | ||
| 12 | ๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong | 41% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Bengaluru | 41% | ||
| 14 | ๐จ๐ณ Guangzhou | 40% | ||
| 15 | ๐บ๐ธ Los Angeles | 40% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฆ๐ช Dubai | 40% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Denpasar | 40% | ||
| 18 | ๐ซ๐ท Cannes | 40% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฆ๐ช Abu Dhabi | 40% | ||
| 20 | ๐จ๐พ Larnaca | 40% | ||
| 21 | ๐บ๐ธ New York City | 40% | ||
| 22 | ๐ช๐ธ Bilbao | 40% | ||
| 23 | ๐บ๐ธ Washington | 40% | ||
| 24 | ๐บ๐ธ Denver | 39% | ||
| 25 | ๐ฒ๐จ Monaco | 39% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Goa | 39% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฉ๐ช Hamburg | 39% | ||
| 28 | ๐ถ๐ฆ Doha | 39% | ||
| 29 | ๐บ๐ธ Chicago | 39% | ||
| 30 | ๐ท๐บ Moscow | 39% | Share of visiting nomads who are foundersn=157,423 nomads | |
๐งโ๐ญ Fewest founders | ||||
| # | City | Founders | ||
| 1 | ๐ฆ๐ท Bariloche | 23% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฆ๐ท El Calafate | 25% | ||
| 3 | ๐ต๐ช Arequipa | 25% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฌ๐ง Glasgow | 27% | ||
| 5 | ๐ช๐จ Cuenca | 27% | ||
| 6 | ๐จ๐ท Puerto Viejo | 27% | ||
| 7 | ๐ง๐ฆ Sarajevo | 27% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฆ๐ท Mendoza | 27% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Guadalajara | 27% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Merida | 27% | ||
| 11 | ๐ง๐ฌ Plovdiv | 27% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฆ๐ฑ Sarandรซ | 28% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Cristรณbal de las Casas | 28% | ||
| 14 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Christchurch | 28% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puerto Escondido | 28% | ||
| 16 | ๐ช๐ธ Granada | 28% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฐ๐ท Busan | 28% | ||
| 18 | ๐ง๐ฆ Mostar | 28% | ||
| 19 | ๐ต๐ช Cusco | 28% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Oaxaca | 28% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puebla | 28% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฆ๐ท Cordoba | 28% | ||
| 23 | ๐จ๐ด Santa Marta | 28% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฌ๐ง Liverpool | 28% | ||
| 25 | ๐ช๐จ Quito | 29% | ||
| 26 | ๐ญ๐ท Zadar | 29% | ||
| 27 | ๐ง๐ด La Paz | 29% | ||
| 28 | ๐จ๐ท Santa Teresa | 29% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฉ๐ด Punta Cana | 29% | ||
| 30 | ๐ฎ๐น Bologna | 29% | Share of visiting nomads who are foundersn=157,423 nomads | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city in UI/UX or creative design roles (of those who shared their profession).
๐จ Most designer-heavy visitors | ||||
| # | City | Designers | ||
| 1 | ๐ช๐ธ San Sebastian | 39% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฌ๐ง Brighton | 38% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฆ๐บ Perth | 37% | ||
| 4 | ๐บ๐ธ Portland | 36% | ||
| 5 | ๐บ๐ธ Los Angeles | 36% | ||
| 6 | ๐ช๐ธ Tarifa | 35% | ||
| 7 | ๐จ๐ณ Shanghai | 34% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Essaouira | 34% | ||
| 9 | ๐ซ๐ท Cannes | 34% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฆ๐บ Melbourne | 34% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฒ๐พ Penang | 34% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Tulum | 33% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Tangier | 33% | ||
| 14 | ๐ง๐ธ Nassau | 33% | ||
| 15 | ๐ช๐ธ Bilbao | 33% | ||
| 16 | ๐ต๐น Faro | 33% | ||
| 17 | ๐น๐ท Izmir | 33% | ||
| 18 | ๐ง๐ช Antwerp | 33% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Phnom Penh | 33% | ||
| 20 | ๐บ๐ธ San Francisco | 33% | ||
| 21 | ๐ต๐ญ Siargao | 33% | ||
| 22 | ๐บ๐ธ New Orleans | 33% | ||
| 23 | ๐จ๐ณ Beijing | 33% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | 33% | ||
| 25 | ๐ซ๐ท Montpellier | 33% | ||
| 26 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Pha Ngan | 33% | ||
| 27 | ๐บ๐ธ Dallas | 32% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฉ๐ช Berlin | 32% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฒ๐พ Langkawi | 32% | ||
| 30 | ๐ช๐ธ Fuerteventura | 32% | Share of visiting nomads who are designersn=157,423 nomads | |
๐ง Fewest designers | ||||
| # | City | Designers | ||
| 1 | ๐ต๐พ Asuncion | 19% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฆ๐ท Bariloche | 21% | ||
| 3 | ๐จ๐พ Limassol | 22% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฆ๐ท Ushuaia | 22% | ||
| 5 | ๐บ๐ธ Denver | 22% | ||
| 6 | ๐ช๐ฌ Luxor | 22% | ||
| 7 | ๐ช๐ฌ Dahab | 23% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฆ๐ท El Calafate | 23% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฆ๐ฉ Andorra la Vella | 23% | ||
| 10 | ๐ง๐ท Foz do Iguaรงu | 24% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Almaty | 24% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฒ๐ช Podgorica | 24% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฑ๐น Vilnius | 24% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฎ๐น Verona | 24% | ||
| 15 | ๐ญ๐ท Zadar | 24% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฎ๐น Catania | 24% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฌ๐ท Rhodes | 24% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฑ๐บ Luxembourg | 24% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฐ๐ฌ Bishkek | 24% | ||
| 20 | ๐ง๐พ Minsk | 24% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฆ๐ฟ Baku | 24% | ||
| 22 | ๐บ๐ธ Atlanta | 24% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puebla | 25% | ||
| 24 | ๐จ๐พ Paphos | 25% | ||
| 25 | ๐ฌ๐ช Tbilisi | 25% | ||
| 26 | ๐ธ๐ช Gothenburg | 25% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฐ๐ท Jeju Island | 25% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฉ๐ด Santo Domingo | 25% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฎ๐น Lake Como | 25% | ||
| 30 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Yerevan | 25% | Share of visiting nomads who are designersn=157,423 nomads | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who lift — gym, strength training and Crossfit (casual running, cycling and yoga are not counted).
๐ช Fittest visiting nomads | ||||
| # | City | Gym / strength | ||
| 1 | ๐ต๐น Ericeira | 56% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Uluwatu | 51% | ||
| 3 | ๐จ๐ด Medellรญn | 51% | ||
| 4 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Samui | 51% | ||
| 5 | ๐บ๐ธ Atlanta | 50% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Playa del Carmen | 50% | ||
| 7 | ๐จ๐ท Santa Teresa | 50% | ||
| 8 | ๐ต๐ญ Siargao | 50% | ||
| 9 | ๐จ๐ด Cali | 50% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฉ๐ด Santo Domingo | 49% | ||
| 11 | ๐ง๐ท Florianopolis | 49% | ||
| 12 | ๐น๐ญ Krabi | 49% | ||
| 13 | ๐ง๐ท Rio de Janeiro | 49% | ||
| 14 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Pha Ngan | 49% | ||
| 15 | ๐บ๐ธ Miami | 49% | ||
| 16 | ๐จ๐ท Tamarindo | 49% | ||
| 17 | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama City | 49% | ||
| 18 | ๐ต๐ท San Juan | 49% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Canggu | 48% | ||
| 20 | ๐จ๐ด Cartagena | 48% | ||
| 21 | ๐ญ๐ท Hvar | 48% | ||
| 22 | ๐ช๐ธ Marbella | 48% | ||
| 23 | ๐ช๐ธ Fuerteventura | 48% | ||
| 24 | ๐จ๐ท Puerto Viejo | 48% | ||
| 25 | ๐ถ๐ฆ Doha | 48% | ||
| 26 | ๐ญ๐ท Dubrovnik | 48% | ||
| 27 | ๐บ๐ธ Dallas | 48% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Sayulita | 48% | ||
| 29 | ๐ช๐ธ Mallorca | 48% | ||
| 30 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Guadalajara | 48% | Share of visiting nomads into gym & strength trainingn=153,615 nomads | |
๐๏ธ Least gym-going visitors | ||||
| # | City | Gym / strength | ||
| 1 | ๐ฌ๐ง Glasgow | 32% | ||
| 2 | ๐ณ๐ฑ The Hague | 33% | ||
| 3 | ๐น๐ท Izmir | 33% | ||
| 4 | ๐ง๐ฌ Plovdiv | 34% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Miguel de Allende | 34% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Yogyakarta | 35% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Jaipur | 35% | ||
| 8 | ๐บ๐ฟ Tashkent | 35% | ||
| 9 | ๐ณ๐ด Bergen | 35% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฆ๐ท Ushuaia | 35% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฌ๐ง Belfast | 35% | ||
| 12 | ๐ง๐พ Minsk | 35% | ||
| 13 | ๐ง๐ฆ Sarajevo | 35% | ||
| 14 | ๐ท๐ธ Novi Sad | 35% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Almaty | 36% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Yerevan | 36% | ||
| 17 | ๐ต๐ช Arequipa | 36% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฌ๐ง Edinburgh | 36% | ||
| 19 | ๐น๐ญ Chiang Rai | 36% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Cristรณbal de las Casas | 36% | ||
| 21 | ๐จ๐ณ Chengdu | 36% | ||
| 22 | ๐ซ๐ท Lyon | 37% | ||
| 23 | ๐จ๐ฑ San Pedro de Atacama | 37% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Fes | 37% | ||
| 25 | ๐ง๐ฆ Mostar | 37% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฌ๐ฎ Gibraltar | 37% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฆ๐ท Cordoba | 37% | ||
| 28 | ๐ง๐ท Foz do Iguaรงu | 37% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฒ๐ฉ Chisinau | 38% | ||
| 30 | ๐บ๐ธ Portland | 38% | Share of visiting nomads into gym & strength trainingn=153,615 nomads | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who list beer, wine, cocktails or drinking among their likes (of those who shared any lifestyle likes).
๐บ Biggest drinkers | ||||
| # | City | Drinks | ||
| 1 | ๐ฆ๐ท Mendoza | 70% | ||
| 2 | ๐จ๐บ Havana | 65% | ||
| 3 | ๐จ๐ด Santa Marta | 65% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฌ๐ง Manchester | 64% | ||
| 5 | ๐บ๐พ Montevideo | 64% | ||
| 6 | ๐ป๐ณ Hue | 64% | ||
| 7 | ๐ญ๐ท Dubrovnik | 64% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฎ๐ช Dublin | 64% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฆ๐ท Cordoba | 64% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฎ๐น Florence | 63% | ||
| 11 | ๐ต๐ญ Boracay | 63% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Isla Mujeres | 63% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฆ๐ท Bariloche | 63% | ||
| 14 | ๐ญ๐ท Split | 63% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฎ๐ธ Reykjavik | 63% | ||
| 16 | ๐ฏ๐ต Sapporo | 63% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cancun | 63% | ||
| 18 | ๐ช๐จ Quito | 63% | ||
| 19 | ๐ช๐ธ Seville | 63% | ||
| 20 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Lanta | 63% | ||
| 21 | ๐จ๐ด Cartagena | 63% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฌ๐น Antigua | 63% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฌ๐ท Santorini | 63% | ||
| 24 | ๐ญ๐ท Zadar | 63% | ||
| 25 | ๐ช๐จ Cuenca | 63% | ||
| 26 | ๐ณ๐ฟ Queenstown | 63% | ||
| 27 | ๐ต๐ท San Juan | 63% | ||
| 28 | ๐ง๐ธ Nassau | 63% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Guadalajara | 63% | ||
| 30 | ๐บ๐ธ New Orleans | 62% | Share of visiting nomads who like alcoholn=153,615 nomads | |
๐ฑ Most sober visitors | ||||
| # | City | Drinks | ||
| 1 | ๐จ๐ณ Shenzhen | 48% | ||
| 2 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Utrecht | 49% | ||
| 3 | ๐น๐ณ Tunis | 49% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฎ๐น Lake Como | 49% | ||
| 5 | ๐ต๐น Portimรฃo | 49% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฉ๐ช Stuttgart | 50% | ||
| 7 | ๐จ๐ณ Guangzhou | 50% | ||
| 8 | ๐ธ๐ป San Salvador | 50% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Bengaluru | 51% | ||
| 10 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Sanur | 51% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Jakarta | 51% | ||
| 12 | ๐บ๐ธ Honolulu | 51% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Ubud | 51% | ||
| 14 | ๐ท๐บ Moscow | 51% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฒ๐ฉ Chisinau | 51% | ||
| 16 | ๐น๐ญ Hua Hin | 52% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฆ๐ช Abu Dhabi | 52% | ||
| 18 | ๐ง๐พ Minsk | 52% | ||
| 19 | ๐ด๐ฒ Muscat | 52% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Uluwatu | 52% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฐ๐ฌ Bishkek | 52% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฐ๐ท Seoul | 52% | ||
| 23 | ๐ป๐ณ Da Nang | 52% | ||
| 24 | ๐จ๐ญ Geneva | 52% | ||
| 25 | ๐ท๐ด Timisoara | 52% | ||
| 26 | ๐ต๐ญ Manila | 52% | ||
| 27 | ๐บ๐ธ Portland | 53% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฒ๐ช Podgorica | 53% | ||
| 29 | ๐จ๐ณ Shanghai | 53% | ||
| 30 | ๐ฐ๐ท Busan | 53% | Share of visiting nomads who like alcoholn=153,615 nomads | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who list partying among their likes (of those who shared any lifestyle likes).
๐ Biggest partiers | ||||
| # | City | Parties | ||
| 1 | ๐ช๐ธ Ibiza | 29% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฌ๐ท Mykonos | 25% | ||
| 3 | ๐ญ๐ท Hvar | 24% | ||
| 4 | ๐ง๐ท Rio de Janeiro | 22% | ||
| 5 | ๐จ๐ด Santa Marta | 21% | ||
| 6 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Phi Phi | 21% | ||
| 7 | ๐จ๐ด Cartagena | 21% | ||
| 8 | ๐ญ๐ท Split | 21% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฌ๐น Guatemala City | 21% | ||
| 10 | ๐จ๐บ Havana | 21% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Goa | 21% | ||
| 12 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Pha Ngan | 21% | ||
| 13 | ๐น๐ญ Pattaya | 21% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Tangier | 21% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Tulum | 20% | ||
| 16 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Tao | 20% | ||
| 17 | ๐จ๐ด Bogota | 20% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Playa del Carmen | 20% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | 20% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Mumbai | 20% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Gili Air | 20% | ||
| 22 | ๐ง๐ท Salvador | 20% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฒ๐จ Monaco | 20% | ||
| 24 | ๐จ๐ด Medellรญn | 20% | ||
| 25 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Fes | 20% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Seminyak | 20% | ||
| 27 | ๐จ๐ฆ Montreal | 20% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Cabo San Lucas | 20% | ||
| 29 | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama City | 20% | ||
| 30 | ๐ฆ๐บ Perth | 20% | Share of visiting nomads who like partyingn=153,615 nomads | |
๐ด Quietest visitors | ||||
| # | City | Parties | ||
| 1 | ๐ธ๐ช Malmรถ | 10% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Sanur | 10% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฉ๐ช Hamburg | 10% | ||
| 4 | ๐ท๐ธ Novi Sad | 11% | ||
| 5 | ๐จ๐ณ Chengdu | 11% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฎ๐น Lake Como | 11% | ||
| 7 | ๐ง๐ช Antwerp | 12% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฎ๐น Verona | 12% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Essaouira | 12% | ||
| 10 | ๐บ๐ธ Dallas | 12% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Yerevan | 12% | ||
| 12 | ๐ฐ๐ฌ Bishkek | 12% | ||
| 13 | ๐ง๐พ Minsk | 13% | ||
| 14 | ๐บ๐ฟ Tashkent | 13% | ||
| 15 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Weligama | 13% | ||
| 16 | ๐ธ๐ช Gothenburg | 13% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ San Miguel de Allende | 13% | ||
| 18 | ๐ต๐ฑ Wrocลaw | 13% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฌ๐ช Tbilisi | 13% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฎ๐ณ Bengaluru | 13% | ||
| 21 | ๐ต๐พ Asuncion | 13% | ||
| 22 | ๐ต๐ญ Siargao | 13% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฌ๐ท Rhodes | 13% | ||
| 24 | ๐ง๐ฌ Plovdiv | 13% | ||
| 25 | ๐ฎ๐น Pisa | 13% | ||
| 26 | ๐ด๐ฒ Muscat | 13% | ||
| 27 | ๐น๐ญ Chiang Rai | 13% | ||
| 28 | ๐ซ๐ท Strasbourg | 13% | ||
| 29 | ๐จ๐ญ Geneva | 13% | ||
| 30 | ๐บ๐ธ Denver | 13% | Share of visiting nomads who like partyingn=153,615 nomads | |
Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who say they’re single (of those who shared their relationship status).
๐ Most single visitors | ||||
| # | City | Single | ||
| 1 | ๐จ๐ด Medellรญn | 79% | ||
| 2 | ๐ต๐ญ Cebu | 76% | ||
| 3 | ๐ช๐จ Quito | 75% | ||
| 4 | ๐จ๐ด Cartagena | 74% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puerto Escondido | 74% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฌ๐น Antigua | 74% | ||
| 7 | ๐ง๐ท Florianopolis | 74% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฐ๐ช Nairobi | 74% | ||
| 9 | ๐ง๐ท Rio de Janeiro | 74% | ||
| 10 | ๐ต๐ญ Manila | 73% | ||
| 11 | ๐ช๐ฌ Cairo | 73% | ||
| 12 | ๐ช๐ธ Ibiza | 73% | ||
| 13 | ๐จ๐ท San Josรฉ | 73% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฆ๐ท Buenos Aires | 73% | ||
| 15 | ๐ต๐ช Lima | 73% | ||
| 16 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bansko | 73% | ||
| 17 | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama City | 72% | ||
| 18 | ๐ญ๐ท Zagreb | 72% | ||
| 19 | ๐ต๐พ Asuncion | 72% | ||
| 20 | ๐ง๐ท Sรฃo Paulo | 72% | ||
| 21 | ๐ต๐ช Cusco | 72% | ||
| 22 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Canggu | 72% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico City | 72% | ||
| 24 | ๐จ๐ด Bogota | 72% | ||
| 25 | ๐น๐ผ Taipei | 72% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Playa del Carmen | 72% | ||
| 27 | ๐ช๐ธ Gran Canaria | 72% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฑ๐ฆ Vientiane | 71% | ||
| 29 | ๐ช๐ธ Valencia | 71% | ||
| 30 | ๐จ๐ณ Guangzhou | 71% | Share of visiting nomads who are singlen=72,580 nomads | |
๐ Most coupled-up visitors | ||||
| # | City | Single | ||
| 1 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Phi Phi | 57% | ||
| 2 | ๐ป๐ฆ Vatican City | 59% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฉ๐ช Frankfurt | 60% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฆ๐น Salzburg | 60% | ||
| 5 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | 60% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฒ๐พ Penang | 61% | ||
| 7 | ๐บ๐ธ Seattle | 61% | ||
| 8 | ๐จ๐พ Larnaca | 61% | ||
| 9 | ๐น๐ญ Ko Lanta | 61% | ||
| 10 | ๐ง๐ช Bruges | 62% | ||
| 11 | ๐ฆ๐ช Abu Dhabi | 62% | ||
| 12 | ๐น๐ท Antalya | 62% | ||
| 13 | ๐ท๐บ Moscow | 62% | ||
| 14 | ๐น๐ญ Krabi | 62% | ||
| 15 | ๐บ๐ธ Austin | 62% | ||
| 16 | ๐จ๐บ Havana | 62% | ||
| 17 | ๐ณ๐ด Oslo | 62% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฒ๐น Sliema | 63% | ||
| 19 | ๐บ๐ธ Las Vegas | 63% | ||
| 20 | ๐ท๐บ Saint Petersburg | 63% | ||
| 21 | ๐บ๐ธ San Francisco | 63% | ||
| 22 | ๐บ๐ธ San Diego | 63% | ||
| 23 | ๐บ๐ธ Los Angeles | 63% | ||
| 24 | ๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong | 63% | ||
| 25 | ๐ถ๐ฆ Doha | 63% | ||
| 26 | ๐ซ๐ท Paris | 63% | ||
| 27 | ๐ฉ๐ฐ Copenhagen | 63% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฉ๐ช Hamburg | 64% | ||
| 29 | ๐ฎ๐น Venice | 64% | ||
| 30 | ๐จ๐ฆ Vancouver | 64% | Share of visiting nomads who are singlen=72,580 nomads | |
A blended 0-100 score of the visiting nomads to each city, combining how attractive they’re rated, their median income, and how many hold a graduate degree. Each city is percentile-ranked against the others on all three, then averaged with equal weight.
๐ Most attractive, rich & educated | ||||
| # | City | Score | ||
| 1 | ๐บ๐ธ Boston | 87% | ||
| 2 | ๐จ๐ญ Zurich | 83% | ||
| 3 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ Cape Town | 79% | ||
| 4 | ๐ฎ๐ธ Reykjavik | 74% | ||
| 5 | ๐จ๐ญ Geneva | 73% | ||
| 6 | ๐ง๐ท Florianopolis | 71% | ||
| 7 | ๐ธ๐ช Stockholm | 70% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Tulum | 70% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฎ๐ฑ Tel Aviv | 70% | ||
| 10 | ๐ง๐ท Sรฃo Paulo | 69% | ||
| 11 | ๐ต๐น Madeira | 69% | ||
| 12 | ๐บ๐ธ New York City | 69% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฉ๐ช Munich | 68% | ||
| 14 | ๐ง๐ท Rio de Janeiro | 68% | ||
| 15 | ๐ช๐ธ Ibiza | 67% | ||
| 16 | ๐ณ๐ด Oslo | 66% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฉ๐ฐ Copenhagen | 65% | ||
| 18 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Marrakesh | 64% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฆ๐บ Sydney | 63% | ||
| 20 | ๐บ๐ธ Chicago | 63% | ||
| 21 | ๐จ๐ฆ Montreal | 63% | ||
| 22 | ๐ช๐ธ Mallorca | 62% | ||
| 23 | ๐ธ๐ฎ Ljubljana | 62% | ||
| 24 | ๐ฉ๐ช Frankfurt | 62% | ||
| 25 | ๐บ๐ธ San Diego | 61% | ||
| 26 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Puerto Escondido | 61% | ||
| 27 | ๐จ๐ณ Beijing | 60% | ||
| 28 | ๐บ๐ธ San Francisco | 60% | ||
| 29 | ๐บ๐ธ Austin | 60% | ||
| 30 | ๐ฎ๐น Palermo | 59% | Blend of attractiveness, income & education of visiting nomadsn=48,128 nomads | |
๐๏ธ Least attractive, lowest income & least educated | ||||
| # | City | Score | ||
| 1 | ๐น๐ญ Pattaya | 1% | ||
| 2 | ๐ฑ๐ฐ Colombo | 6% | ||
| 3 | ๐ป๐ณ Da Nang | 8% | ||
| 4 | ๐ต๐ญ Cebu | 10% | ||
| 5 | ๐น๐ญ Phuket | 13% | ||
| 6 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Phnom Penh | 13% | ||
| 7 | ๐ฒ๐พ Kuala Lumpur | 14% | ||
| 8 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Jakarta | 14% | ||
| 9 | ๐ฆ๐ฑ Tirana | 14% | ||
| 10 | ๐ต๐ญ Manila | 14% | ||
| 11 | ๐ป๐ณ Ho Chi Minh City | 14% | ||
| 12 | ๐ป๐ณ Hanoi | 16% | ||
| 13 | ๐ฏ๐ต Fukuoka | 18% | ||
| 14 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Seminyak | 19% | ||
| 15 | ๐น๐ญ Krabi | 21% | ||
| 16 | ๐บ๐พ Montevideo | 22% | ||
| 17 | ๐ฏ๐ต Osaka | 22% | ||
| 18 | ๐น๐ญ Bangkok | 24% | ||
| 19 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Almaty | 24% | ||
| 20 | ๐ฐ๐ญ Siem Reap | 24% | ||
| 21 | ๐ฒ๐พ Penang | 25% | ||
| 22 | ๐น๐ผ Taipei | 27% | ||
| 23 | ๐ฐ๐ท Busan | 28% | ||
| 24 | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama City | 29% | ||
| 25 | ๐ต๐พ Asuncion | 29% | ||
| 26 | ๐ป๐ณ Hoi An | 30% | ||
| 27 | ๐ช๐จ Quito | 31% | ||
| 28 | ๐ฐ๐ท Seoul | 31% | ||
| 29 | ๐ท๐ธ Belgrade | 31% | ||
| 30 | ๐ญ๐บ Budapest | 31% | Blend of attractiveness, income & education of visiting nomadsn=48,128 nomads | |
Share of members from each signup country ever warned by our moderators or by Nomad Bot, for things like self promotion, job posts or spam. Human mods issued most warnings from 2019 to 2023, Nomad Bot took over in 2024. Only countries with at least 100 members are ranked.
๐บ Most spammy countries |
||
| # | Country | Warned |
| 1 | ๐ฆ๐ท Argentina | 24.5% |
| 2 | ๐ฑ๐น Lithuania | 20% |
| 3 | ๐จ๐ด Colombia | 19.4% |
| 4 | ๐ฎ๐น Italy | 19% |
| 5 | ๐ช๐ธ Spain | 18.8% |
| 6 | ๐ง๐ช Belgium | 18.5% |
| 7 | ๐ง๐ท Brazil | 17.8% |
| 8 | ๐บ๐ฆ Ukraine | 17.7% |
| 9 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa | 17.6% |
| 10 | ๐ช๐ช Estonia | 17.4% | Share of members by country warned for spamming chatn=41,966 members |
๐ Least spammy countries |
||
| # | Country | Warned |
| 1 | ๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong | 5.4% |
| 2 | ๐ฏ๐ต Japan | 8% |
| 3 | ๐ณ๐ด Norway | 8.1% |
| 4 | ๐ฆ๐ช United Arab Emirates | 8.3% |
| 5 | ๐บ๐ธ United States | 9.2% |
| 6 | ๐น๐ญ Thailand | 9.2% |
| 7 | ๐ฐ๐ท South Korea | 9.4% |
| 8 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Kazakhstan | 11% |
| 9 | ๐ท๐บ Russia | 11.2% |
| 10 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bulgaria | 11.3% | Share of members by country warned for spamming chatn=41,966 members |
Check out Nomads.com to find the best places to live and work remotely, and meet other people also traveling as a digital nomad.



5 going ๐ฅ
๐ฅพ
Let's go hiking in Straussberg lake
๐ฉ๐ช Berlin · Sat Oct 10, 9:00
1 going ๐ฅ
โ
Coffee and conversation
๐ฟ๐ฆ Cape Town · Sat Oct 10, 11:00



~7 expected ๐ฅ
๐น
Drink a Chai in Bengaluru
๐ฎ๐ณ Bengaluru · Sat Oct 10, 21:00

~3 expected ๐ฅ
โ
CO-WORK MONDAYs at Lighthouse (Whale Park) Da Nang
๐ป๐ณ Da Nang · Mon Oct 12, 10:00

2 going ๐ฅ
โ
Coworking in a cozy coffeeshop
๐ฒ๐พ Kuala Lumpur · Tue Oct 13, 16:00

~6 expected ๐ฅ
๐น
Drinks and Tapas
๐ช๐ธ Malaga · Tue Oct 13, 20:00
~3 expected ๐ฅ
โ
Thursday Builders Coffee Cowork #1 at swanbase
๐ซ๐ท Paris · Thu Oct 15, 9:00

~6 expected ๐ฅ
๐น
๐ฅณMeetup #120 - Paraguay Nomads Thursday Social
๐ต๐พ Asuncion · Thu Oct 15, 20:00
~2 expected ๐ฅ
โ
Creative Coworking
๐ต๐น Ericeira · Fri Nov 6, 10:00
~3 expected ๐ฅ
Can't login? See the FAQ










By signing up, you agree to our terms of service and community guidelines.
One-time-payment: $19.99
Billed once. Then never again. 7-day money back guarantee
โ Just $1 to avoid spammers
Nomads.com members
work remotely at









๐ Thanks for signing up! I hope you like my site. I put a lot of effort into making it for years!
๐ฌ First, please go to your email and click the confirm link first to verify your email address
โ๏ธ Check your spam folder if you can't find it, because we got reports it ends up there sometimes
๐ After you confirm your email we'll send you an email with more info
๐ฉโ๐ป You can start using Nomads.com's member-only features now!