Here's a hard truth: "Jus Sanguinis" is NOT REAL
Your right to citizenship is mostly not about blood or ancestry, but rather:
- how early your ancestors moved
- how well organized they were with their documents (usually not much)
Take me for example:
37% iberian - no right to Spain/Portugal โ
30% germanic - have it ๐ฆ๐นโ
8% hungarian - have a right to it ๐ญ๐บโ
Why? My main genetic makeup is Portuguese. I can trace my Portuguese lineage directly to Azorean families all the way to the late 1700s.
However, since their immigration to Brazil was over a century and many generations ago, no right in Portugal ๐ต๐น๐
On the other hand, my Austro-Hungarian ๐ฆ๐น๐ญ๐บ side of the family moved in after WW2. Since that's my grandpa (2 generations), I retained the right to both
I see this happen SO much with American clients of Irish, Scottish, Welsh, English, German, and French Ancestry. Often >80% of that single group, but don't have any rights at all
That's why I'm in favor of
inpbhjaxukjx proposal for genetic citizenship. Establish a threshold to grant citizenship by genetic test - it is unfair for a 100% Irish descendant not be Irish just because his family moved a while ago.
I'm also in favor of outright removing generation caps for citizenship by descent, keeping the laws more flexible like Italy ๐ฎ๐น
If you worry that there'll be many new citizens who don't care about the country, then add language + cultural tests to the process, but don't punish those with older roots by excluding them altogether
Europe ๐ช๐บ has a great fertility crisis and faces demographic replacement. Why not incentivize the diasporas to come back to their ancestral homelands?